Tom Kennedy you have a good player there. still lives in bury, and from rochdale fc as a young player. Alan Kennedy's nephew I think Signed by Pearson just before he left the first time, he got shuffled out of it under Sven's waste cash binge, and stuck behind Konchesky who was ever present, was loaned out to Peterborough Had the odd game when Pearson returned Better going forward than defensively generally but is quick and creates well. More of a wing back than a solid full back I suppose
You've never seen a post on here alluding to the fact that Hill signs players from Rochdale whilst simultaneously expressing an air of discontent? Ok Mark.
Not what I said is it? I was assuming as this thread is about Tom Kennedy, there was a load of posts saying he was **** because he played for Rochdale! I have only seen one tongue in cheek post about it, so I asked if you could show me the ones I had missed. Bearing in mind that no-one had mentioned it on this thread before you did!
You assumed incorrectly then Mark. Trying to be clever doesn't suit you. It just comes across as childish, whilst I was a having a genuine debate on the other post with Jay.
Lowry.......tha reight..........its a bit worring that nearly all of the Keeeflickers signings have a Rochdale connection Dunt the Keeeflicker trust other players from other clubs, or what
He clearly does. And if we go down he'll be crucified for it. If we stay up, I expect him to be equally lauded for it too. That's all.
Explain...I got your point about mentioning the OP, yet as I said, my debate with Jay was just that - a debate. Nothing two faced about it. You seem hell bent on some childish pursuit of angst.
And as for being a two-faced fecker... I post my opinions with my avatar as my own image whereas few others do. Hardly two faced. If anyone wants to have a face to face debate about football then I'd happily go and have an hour over a beer or three next time I'm home. My views would still be the same.