They are all big games as today has shown. Every game is big for Hill as folk are sharpening their pitchforks and wielding with glee at every oppertunity.
Give over oss. Paying fans have the right to criticise him after 1 win in 12. Its not a witch hunt, its based purely on performance.
I think another couple of teams as well as Birmingham will get dragged down with us, possibly Huddersfield and Charlton.
It's gunna be a scrap right up to the last day and if I was Hill, I would want 11 warriors in my team. In fact Hill pretty much said this in his post match interview, so hopefully we now start to see a settled team (give or take suspensions and injuries) that includes Jim O'Brien, Sir Bobby................and Dagnall (no goals but work-rate is apparently creating space/chances for others). It's amazing what a win does for both confidence and opinion..............YOU REDS !!!
SadMark would be more apt username, you need to cheer up. Mo I'd say it was based more on results than performance; a draw a Leicester, the better team against Wednesday but lost, we have drawn with a lot of good/ big clubs this season, given our shitty set of circumstances and backward directors etc we aren't that far off. I don't agree with everything Hill does but I don't think its fundementally Hills fault. For example centre halfs. Hill knows we need one, we know this because its obvious to everyone and he wanted Greer. He couldn't get Greer so what does he do? Go buy someone he doesn't think is good enough that we can afford? It will be interesting to see what happens when Stones gets sold. To me that will be make or break time.
So shouldn't we be having a go at him for seemingly having no plan B incase we couldn't get Greer? What's his excuse for not giving Edwards and/or Collins a chance? His record with us for signing defenders has been poor.