Tyson Fury stripped of IBF belt..

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Whitey, Dec 8, 2015.

  1. Whi

    Whitey Guest

    According to the twitterers.
     
  2. MarioKempes

    MarioKempes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    40,155
    Likes Received:
    7,178
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Project Manager
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    What for?
     
  3. Don

    DonnyTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2014
    Messages:
    3,244
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Shame, would have preferred to see him lose them in the ring.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  4. madmark62

    madmark62 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Messages:
    20,282
    Likes Received:
    190
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Floating along lifes waterways
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    For rematching with Klitchko, instead of his mandatory against Glazkov.
    Glazkov could have had a step aside agreement but Fury refused to negotiate.
    Crazy world of Boxing alphabets strike again
     
  5. andytyke

    andytyke Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    13,123
    Likes Received:
    2,909
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Featherstone
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    So Klitchko wont fight fury unless he rematches him if he loses. Then fury gets stripped of a belt for that very rematch

    madness
     
  6. Whi

    Whitey Guest

    The IBF are the strictest of the organizations for enforcing their mandatories. But this one seems harsh even for them.
     
  7. Skryptic

    Skryptic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,303
    Likes Received:
    3,643
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Is boxing determined to kill itself off?
     
  8. sel

    selby Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    2,759
    Likes Received:
    1,817
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Selby
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    So now the title will be fought for as a vacant title as well as the Fury vs Klitchcko rematch? Is it just another way to make money? Two world title fights instead of one? Or am I being mischievous?
     
  9. funnyfella23

    funnyfella23 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,035
    Likes Received:
    395
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Occupation:
    Civil Servant
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Crazy idea I know but how about just one belt per weight....
     
  10. Dja

    Django Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2013
    Messages:
    12,610
    Likes Received:
    9,929
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Fury can't complain.

    He knew the deal.

    Basically he was a mandatory challenger which meant he could fight for the world titles with no rematch clause.

    However he & his promoter took a better paid deal which also included a rematch clause.

    If Klitschko would've won there wouldn't have been an issue as he'd have fought Glazkov next.

    It is what it is. They shouldn't moan about the situation & I doubt they will as they chose money over the belt.
     
  11. Ipp

    Ippon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Messages:
    533
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Being a lovely person?

    Sent from my Hudl HT7S3 using Tapatalk
     
  12. e-red

    e-red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    2,583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    FBI are doing a great job on FIFA, when do they start on boxing's governing bodies?
     
  13. Dja

    Django Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2013
    Messages:
    12,610
    Likes Received:
    9,929
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    This one the IBF are the only one that follow rules. It would've been dodgy if they'd not stripped dodgy.

    The WBO, WBC & in particular the WBA are dodgy beyond belief
     
  14. dreamboy3000

    dreamboy3000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    60,894
    Likes Received:
    27,317
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    DB3K Towers
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It's not like he's purposely avoiding the IBF number 1 contender. He's no choice but to face Vlad again. If he hadn't have taken his rematch, Fury could have fought him. The IBF are weird for not wanting their title to be defended in a blockbuster rematch. They have also made whoever their new champion ends up being look small try and irrelevant for winning a world title without beating the best the division has.
     
  15. Dja

    Django Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2013
    Messages:
    12,610
    Likes Received:
    9,929
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    He did have the choice.

    Fury was mandatory for Wladimir's WBA & WBO belts, Glazkov was mandatory for the IBF belt & the mandatory was due in August.

    Glazkov agreed to let Fury fight Wladimir first on the understanding that he fought the winner.

    Because the Wlad - Fury fight was a mandatory challenge there was no need for a rematch to be in the contract. However, Wlad's team offered Fury's team a contract outside of the mandatory one whereby Fury got more money but there was a rematch clause.

    This meant that if Wlad won he fought Glazkov in Spring 2016 but Fury knew that if he bet Wlad he'd have to vacate the IBF to fight Wlad in a rematch. His team chose money over belts.

    It would've been completely unfair for Glazkov to wait from August this year til September / October next year for his shot.

    For once a governing body have actually followed rules & not screwed over a fighter for a sum of money
     
  16. Loko the Tyke

    Loko the Tyke Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2005
    Messages:
    16,668
    Likes Received:
    17,691
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Spot on. There's a bit more to it than that though. Klitschko and Fury never told the IBF that the contract for the right had a rematch clause included, which is why he's been stripped as all they've done since Tyson won the fight is enforce their own rules.

    If the IBF had been informed of the rematch clause prior to the fight, and agreed with the contract and sactioning fees proposed as part of it, Fury wouldn't have been stripped.

    Own goal by Fury. But the likes of Haye, Joshua, Parker and then a series of absolute no hoper heavyweights, will all be licking their lips at another belt being up for grabs.
     
  17. Whi

    Whitey Guest

    I see it as a good thing. Fury vs Wlad II is a bigger/better fight. And it gives others a chance to take the IBF belt, hopefully another Brit. And hopefully, Fury comes through against Wlad, again.

    This weekend ought to be good too. Imagine Whyte beating AJ.... I can't.
     
  18. Ors

    Orsen Kaht Guest

    What's the point of a Klitschko rematch?
     
  19. dreamboy3000

    dreamboy3000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    60,894
    Likes Received:
    27,317
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    DB3K Towers
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    If the likes of Fraudley and Chisora want to have another try it's nothing to do with us :)
     

Share This Page