As An Example........... i'd say Stoke were worse against us there last season, as at least tonight they won a point. Typical case of bad journalism giving opponents no credit.
I'm listening to it too. All about them being so bad but nothing praiseworthy for us, however, the Stoke commentators were full of praise throughout the game for us.
What's the difference to what you get on here? It's about how we played, for most people it's that we play bad rather than the opposition doing well. What do you expect - you are listening to their local radio station.
RE: What's the difference to what you get on here? Are you listening to the phone in Rich? It's like listening to deedah fans. I have said all along that the expectations of some fans drags the reds down, but tonight most fans are happy with the point we have achieved. If you listen to the Stoke fans tonight you just get the impression that they have ideas about 50 miles above their station.