was it me or did they use FOUR SUBS!!!

not that it would change owt.

But I am pretty sure!

 

Only Saw 3 matey

 

i thought theyd used four but I cant actually recall four

i remember when they made their second i mentioned that thyd used all three early and then they made another i was sure it was four.

 

thats exactly what append with me an me dad...

even a few around us thought the same.

Not using it as an excuse though, but i thought they had used 4 for some reason

 

only thing I can think of is that they had somebody off recieving treatment near the dugout

who came back on and people assumed it was a sub.

 

Me dad reckoned they'd used 4.

Dunno meself like, I was half asleep.

 

RE: Me dad reckoned they'd used 4.

Ref and the 4th official will be in for it then if they did.</p>

Game would have to be replayed.
</p>

Not sure I could sit through that again.</p>



</p>


</p>

 

Have to say my mate thought they did !!</p>

 

if thats the case - shouldn't it be replayed?

 

RE: if thats the case - shouldn't it be replayed?

bloke in front of me said they'd used 4 subs

 

right - lets get this reported and get 3 points in the bag!

 

RE: right - lets get this reported and get 3 points in the bag!

Cant report something that people are not 100% sure about.

 

Only recall 3 being announced
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_div_2/4703574.stm

 

only 3 subs used according to yorkshire post

 

I would think they only used 3

Summat funny must have happened though for a number of people to have thought they used 4. Maybe one of their players went off and came back on?

Even if they used 4, who the hell would want to pay to go see that match again!

 

You have a Father then ?

 

On the subject of subs though

Their last one - their player was down injured, having had treatment he had to leave the field before he could come back on, they had a goal kick - so normally they would take the kick and once play was commencing they are allowed to reintroduce the player. However, they decided to sub the player after he'd left the field, and the ref allowed the sub on before the kick was taken! Surely under the ruling he should have not been allowed on until the next break in play.

Also - 4 mins of added on time, then a player down straight away for about a minute but the ref only added the 4 mins on.

 

Allegedly

In reality I reckon I was made from bits taken out of the skip at the back of the hospital and things are unravelling fast.

 

4 came on from what i could tell

 

Same was being said where I sit.