Water..........just use as much as you want

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Young Nudger, Jul 19, 2006.

  1. Young Nudger

    Young Nudger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    14,466
    Likes Received:
    3,095
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Counting great crested newts
    Location:
    Hiding in a reed bed at the local RSPB nature rese
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    No shortage of water in this country
    If you don't beleive me go to Spurn Point and look out over to Lincolnshire
    There is a 7 mile wide river there that is running in to the sea 24/7
    No shortage of water.......shortage of investment in water industry
    Got to keep the share holders sweet
     
  2. EastStander

    EastStander Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    29,883
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Upper tier, Gangway 11
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    So because theres a massive river

    We can use as much treated and purified water as we want?

    That's how it works then?
     
  3. Young Nudger

    Young Nudger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    14,466
    Likes Received:
    3,095
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Counting great crested newts
    Location:
    Hiding in a reed bed at the local RSPB nature rese
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Yep.......keep throwing it on the garden

    At some point the water industry will admit defeat
     
  4. EastStander

    EastStander Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    29,883
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Upper tier, Gangway 11
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    RE: Yep.......keep throwing it on the garden

    I'm not throwing any on the garden - never do, let nature take it's course.

    Bring on the hosepipe bans I say.
     
  5. Spa

    Spartacus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    12,634
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Barnsley, England, United Kingdom, 103126909727190
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Bring on the infrastructure investment!

    keeps me in a good job though I'm more of a shitworks man missen![​IMG][​IMG]</p>

    seriously though water meters are the answer.</p>

    And no you cant just keep pulling it out of the river network...the bunny huggers would go apeshit.</p>
     
  6. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,615
    Likes Received:
    24,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Thames Water claim

    That the water they lose from leaks isnt too serious as most of it flows back into rivers etc and gets re-extracted so the loss of water is not as high as it appears!

    I guess that works for hosepipes too :)

    Y Nudger does have a point - there is only a water shortage because there has been insufficient investement in the industry
     
  7. Spa

    Spartacus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    12,634
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Barnsley, England, United Kingdom, 103126909727190
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Aye lets spend loads of money

    to process water then piss the whole lot into the drains/ rivers / ground then simply pay again to purify it...nice and green..FFS</p>

    The answer lies in the hands of both consumer and supplier.</p>

    Compulsary water meters and investment by the water industry</p>

    New York City once found it cheaper to go and install 50,000? (i think) water efficient toilets to homes for free as it saved more than the cost of a new treatment plant...20 million quid or so for that capacity.</p>

    Thames are a bunch of twits and Ofwat WILL give them a bloody nose sooner or later. record profits / record leakage.</p>
     
  8. Gue

    Guest Guest

    What would really help is two supplies

    We can't use our tap water for drinking or cooking as it contains too much arsenic so we have to use bottled water for anything that's going to end up for human consumption. It's surprising how small a percentage of your household water usage this is and the rest doesn't need to be purified to anything like the same extent. The ideal solution would be separate supplies, one for drinking and one for general usage. Big up-front investment, though, unless the drinking water wasn't actually on-tap but centrally distributed in some way. You soon get used to picking up some water when you're in town and local delivery systems could be arranged.

    As a less drastic solution, I agree with Spartacus re: Compulsory water meters. It's only fair.
     
  9. Young Nudger

    Young Nudger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    14,466
    Likes Received:
    3,095
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Counting great crested newts
    Location:
    Hiding in a reed bed at the local RSPB nature rese
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Solution is this............

    More reservoirs.......and less leaks
    Which means more money spent
    This country has plenty of water
    The media would have you beleive something different e.g. water meters etc etc
    Like I said - go to Spurn Point or alternatively Cleethorpes and you look across 7 miles of river
     
  10. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,615
    Likes Received:
    24,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Water meters

    No problem with that. Just about every other item we consume we pay by the amount used. Still think there wouldnt be a shortage of water if the companies ran things properly though. Thames loses more water that Leeds uses!
     
  11. Gue

    Guest Guest

    Still wasteful

    I agree with what you're saying as far as less leaks but why pay to purify water to drinking standards when over 95% of it is going to be used to water gardens, have baths, etc? There are improvements to be made at both ends and I'd like to see swingeing fines for inefficient water companies coupled with meters at point of delivery as an incentive for consumers to save water.

    I carry between 150 and 200 litres of water from the river to the vegetable patch each day rather than run a hose on it. It irks me to see other people chucking it around like there's an infinite supply. We all end up paying to have it purified and without meters the distribution of that cost is unfair.
     
  12. EastStander

    EastStander Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    29,883
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Upper tier, Gangway 11
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    RE: Still wasteful

    Ban people from watering gardens, permanently, it is needless and wasteful.
     
  13. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: Still wasteful

    Presumably you mean "using mains water".
     
  14. Y Goch

    Y Goch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,079
    Likes Received:
    208
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Aberystwyth / Papua New Guinea
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I am on spring water

    When its dry its dry
     
  15. EastStander

    EastStander Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    29,883
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Upper tier, Gangway 11
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    RE: Still wasteful

    Yes, sorry, if you collect rain water then you can use that.
     
  16. Gue

    Guest Guest

    Thanks (n/t)
     

Share This Page