No shortage of water in this country If you don't beleive me go to Spurn Point and look out over to Lincolnshire There is a 7 mile wide river there that is running in to the sea 24/7 No shortage of water.......shortage of investment in water industry Got to keep the share holders sweet
So because theres a massive river We can use as much treated and purified water as we want? That's how it works then?
RE: Yep.......keep throwing it on the garden I'm not throwing any on the garden - never do, let nature take it's course. Bring on the hosepipe bans I say.
Bring on the infrastructure investment! keeps me in a good job though I'm more of a shitworks man missen!</p> seriously though water meters are the answer.</p> And no you cant just keep pulling it out of the river network...the bunny huggers would go apeshit.</p>
Thames Water claim That the water they lose from leaks isnt too serious as most of it flows back into rivers etc and gets re-extracted so the loss of water is not as high as it appears! I guess that works for hosepipes too Y Nudger does have a point - there is only a water shortage because there has been insufficient investement in the industry
Aye lets spend loads of money to process water then piss the whole lot into the drains/ rivers / ground then simply pay again to purify it...nice and green..FFS</p> The answer lies in the hands of both consumer and supplier.</p> Compulsary water meters and investment by the water industry</p> New York City once found it cheaper to go and install 50,000? (i think) water efficient toilets to homes for free as it saved more than the cost of a new treatment plant...20 million quid or so for that capacity.</p> Thames are a bunch of twits and Ofwat WILL give them a bloody nose sooner or later. record profits / record leakage.</p>
What would really help is two supplies We can't use our tap water for drinking or cooking as it contains too much arsenic so we have to use bottled water for anything that's going to end up for human consumption. It's surprising how small a percentage of your household water usage this is and the rest doesn't need to be purified to anything like the same extent. The ideal solution would be separate supplies, one for drinking and one for general usage. Big up-front investment, though, unless the drinking water wasn't actually on-tap but centrally distributed in some way. You soon get used to picking up some water when you're in town and local delivery systems could be arranged. As a less drastic solution, I agree with Spartacus re: Compulsory water meters. It's only fair.
Solution is this............ More reservoirs.......and less leaks Which means more money spent This country has plenty of water The media would have you beleive something different e.g. water meters etc etc Like I said - go to Spurn Point or alternatively Cleethorpes and you look across 7 miles of river
Water meters No problem with that. Just about every other item we consume we pay by the amount used. Still think there wouldnt be a shortage of water if the companies ran things properly though. Thames loses more water that Leeds uses!
Still wasteful I agree with what you're saying as far as less leaks but why pay to purify water to drinking standards when over 95% of it is going to be used to water gardens, have baths, etc? There are improvements to be made at both ends and I'd like to see swingeing fines for inefficient water companies coupled with meters at point of delivery as an incentive for consumers to save water. I carry between 150 and 200 litres of water from the river to the vegetable patch each day rather than run a hose on it. It irks me to see other people chucking it around like there's an infinite supply. We all end up paying to have it purified and without meters the distribution of that cost is unfair.