Not sure but I bet it'd be Wilson's fault. What if Charlton had equalised last night ? We could have got on at Wilson a bit more.
Aye, let's bring back a young nippy striker who's making the bench at a struggling L2 to play up front on his own. I'd rather read Hemsworth's obvious attacks on Hassell & Steele.
I wouldn't like to stand next to him in the queue for some chips. If he got really hungry you could wind up being thrown through a glass window.
Where's the restriction on freedom of speech? One poster has been allowed to pose a question, others have either offered a different question or given an answer as they see fit.
Re: Not sure but I bet it'd be Wilson's fault. Well it's what you're doing innit. It'll come round to Wilson letting him go to Bury without any cover, or we've got too similar strikers or whatever.
We travelled with 2 strikers and 18 others to Charlton. Let's hope COG doesn't get a bad one from Brown on Saturday. I wonder who he has been told to hack this time
Concede less silly free Kicks Injure less of the opposing players Give less ball away win less flickons
And make fewer grammatical errors. Sorry andytyke, I couldn't resist. Feel free to call me a pedantic arse, I deserve it.
Even if we go down I don't see a future for Rose here. I understand we'd love an academy kid to become a first team regular, but that doesn't hide the fact that he's not yet had a start despite dropping two leagues. If we signed an inexperienced kid from a division four team who'd never started a game in that league and played him we'd be furious at taking that risk especially at this time of the season. Just because he's one of our own doesn't mean we should treat him differently. Obviously he's missing something for Robins, Hill, Flicker, Melon and Wilson all to not really play him.