What possible reason is there to REMOVE yesterdays Rajczi article?

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by KFC, Jan 31, 2007.

  1. KFC

    KFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,734
    Likes Received:
    2,023
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Other than problems with the signing?

    If anyone can think of a valid reason that'd be great as it might help set my cynical mind at rest
     
    KFC, Jan 31, 2007
    #1
  2. nezbfc

    nezbfc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    11,116
    Likes Received:
    6,873
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    For all those moaning barstools who complain about old news and everthing else to do with the site n
     
    nezbfc, Jan 31, 2007
    #2
  3. owe

    owen New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    2,528
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Nottingham, UK
    Home Page:
    owen, Jan 31, 2007
    #3
  4. KFC

    KFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,734
    Likes Received:
    2,023
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    My mistake

    I would have thought it was a pretty relevant piece of information on transfer deadline day, an uncompleted transfer.

    That said, I have now found the article so have settled down a bit!
     
    KFC, Jan 31, 2007
    #4
  5. KFC

    KFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,734
    Likes Received:
    2,023
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Cheers

    Found it a minute ago. panicking slightly less now, but it would still be nice to be kept informed about an uncompleted signing when there are only 5 hours left to complete it.
     
    KFC, Jan 31, 2007
    #5

Share This Page