Which one is more committed?

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by ossettred, Jan 30, 2012.

  1. oss

    ossettred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,517
    Likes Received:
    128
    Location:
    somewhere confused
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    A player with 6 months of is contract left but intent on leaving in the summer?

    A player on 6 months loan and probably won't stay on in the summer?
     
  2. NIGHTMARE

    NIGHTMARE Banned Idiot

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    5,713
    Likes Received:
    2
    Every footballer is committed to them self, and will always give 100% to get noticed and attract a bigger club who will give them more money no matter what contract they are on at the moment
     
  3. RichK

    RichK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    29,729
    Likes Received:
    3,160
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    That just about sums it up.
     
  4. Tarntyke

    Tarntyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Messages:
    15,190
    Likes Received:
    13,529
    Location:
    Stairfoot, b4 famous rahnderbart
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Depends if the loan player still has any contract left i suppose

    .

    As the contracted player still needs to keep himself in the shop window so to speak. Whereas the loan player still under contract at his parent club & therefore his immediate future sorted. There are still other variables to that scenario so not as straight forward as your initial question.
     
  5. oss

    ossettred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,517
    Likes Received:
    128
    Location:
    somewhere confused
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    So no difference

    What about cost? loan player from Prem, contract player heading to Prem both decent players.
     

Share This Page