Who would you choose?

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Guest, Jun 29, 2007.

  1. Gue

    Guest Guest

    The management seem to have favoured Reid.</p>

    What do you think?</p>

    Reid or Nads?</p>
     
  2. EastStander

    EastStander Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    29,883
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Upper tier, Gangway 11
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    What do you mean by that, favoured Reid?
     
  3. Ady

    Ady Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Messages:
    6,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Home
    Home Page:
    Easy

    Reid.
     
  4. madmark62

    madmark62 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Messages:
    20,282
    Likes Received:
    190
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Floating along lifes waterways
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    RE: Easy

    he is definitely a weak link.
    But it was interesting to see that Reid was at Carlisle while Davey was there.
     
  5. Gue

    Guest Guest

    Well, ES.</p>

    Reid was given a contract before his latter one expired, yes?, so too other players.
    </p>

    Nads was kept 'on his toes 'and had to perform in order to warrant another contract.</p>

    I have no idea what went on behind the scenes and will refuse to speculate, but it did seem odd that Nads was not offered a contract, whilst the Club was busily tying uo the contracts of Howard. Devaney, Hassell etc.</p>

    With hindsight, if we had offered Nads the contract then he would still be with us, but the enigma that is/was Nardiello will always see us 'waiting'.</p>

    In this respect, I think Davey was right,</p>

    Danny came up with the goods, became lean and fit and looked the player we always hoped he would be, unfortunately, his latter game performances drew the notice of other clubs.</p>

    I am sad and sorry he has gone as I was a massive fan.</p>

    Makes it harder as a good friend is a massive, QPR fan and is 'over the moon' at signing Nardiello.</p>

    It hurts for me personally as I really rated him.
    </p>

    </p>
     
  6. Gaz

    Gaz Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    5,210
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    No idea. Definitely not at work, though. Honest.
    Home Page:
    Tough choice.

    As a shelf stacker, I reckon Reid's extra height would just edge it, but if we're talking about modelling for an art class, Nads' ability to stand about doing f**k all for prolonged periods puts him well on top.

    As footballers, I wouldn't have either.
     
  7. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: Tough choice.

    :D
     
  8. EastStander

    EastStander Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    29,883
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Upper tier, Gangway 11
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Ah - I see what you mean.

    Well I think, as you say, that Davey was right in getting Nardiello to play for a new contract, gave him a hunger, as did having Rajczi ready to take his place.

    Wouldn't worry about QPR having him.....he'll be back to his lazy, offside self now.




    In which case, now I understand what you mean, I'm going to vote for Reid.
     
  9. Ady

    Ady Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Messages:
    6,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Home
    Home Page:
    yep, my way of thinking.. Reid for me too
     
  10. Redstone

    Redstone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    16,178
    Likes Received:
    11,623
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    a new centre back and striker please

    Reid - Prone to **** ups, doesnt talk to defence enough and generally slow, also seems to be out on the lash a lot, or is that kay? hmm</p>

    </p>

    Nardiello, oh well season starts in august far too inconsitant for me, </p>
     

Share This Page