Why are so many people dismissing this Dean Morgan lad, who we've only got on trial anyway. If he's no good, we'll realise that before we sign him.
Because the fans are impatient for signings and they want to see the likes of Hammill and Adam signing for our club rather than us looking at trialists who have played at a lower level!
Everyone is going on about Charlie Adam as if he is a top player,I've never heard of him.Is he really any better than we've got ?
RE: Never trust anyone with two first names. What about someone with two surnames like this bloke:- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O'Neill_Donaldson Playing against us in The Yorkshire Masters - never heard of him
Like we realised Odejayi and El Manure were ***** before we signed them? It's not like Morgan's even that young, if you're only at that level at 25 then most of the time it means you're not good enough.
Ok then, lets play the positive game.... Started his career with Colchester,played for Reading which is half decent. Played for Luton Town and while there was punted out on loan to Southend, Crewe and Leyton Orient while there, sorry if im not positively brimming with excitement at the prospect of him signing....
So we signed them without watching them then? Davey wouldn't know a ***** player if he walked up to him and said "hello I'm a ***** player". Hence some of the dross he's already inflicted on us.
I heard it on the grapevine that Dwayne Mattis would regularly pretend to be the tea lady Whenever Ryan Kidd was around at Bury.
Because being negative is seen as being street-wise, "I've seen it all before" knowledgeable and cynically cool. If you're wrong you can just shrug it off. It is a credible option for the low on confidence. Being positive suggests a naive, gullible outlook. If you're wrong you will be made a pillar of ridicule for years to come. The fact is, hardly anyone on here knows much about these players so they're just choosing one of these options based on the above reasoning.
