why does odejayi get singled out for so much abuse

He does much more than Stan over the course of the 90 mins. I can see him getting booed at the next home match by the usual morons.

Cringetastic.

 

hurrah.sensible post alert.well said.

 

The simple answer is Odejayi is

****. at least we know Ferenczi can score. I agree he has been crap as well , but in no way is Stan as bad as Odejayi.
In fact I will go as far as to say he ranks as low as Willie Ferry and below Dave Regis in the talent stakes.

 

RE: why does odejayi get singled out for so much abuse nt

If it makes you feel any better chef tyke I will boo Odejayi AND Ferenczi as they are both ****

 

i think the reason KO gets singles out is because the mistakes he makes are more memerable were as stan kind of fades into the background and gets forgoten about

 

Well said

He has an improving all round game. He's never going to be prolific but if he was paired with the right player he could be one half of a good strike force or a good squad player.

Dave Jones even singled him out after the game as a real threat.

The only reason any player should be booed is lack of effort which KO can't be accused of. I'm sure the same idiots who destroyed Paul Reid's career will do the same to KO

 

Dave Jones was taking the piss nt

 

well said again

 

you don't ,obviouslly ,watch him then nt

 

lets be honest

i have seen him play a lot more than you this season.

 

RE: lets be honest

I think you might be very surprised and very wrong..... and he is ***** too

 

True, but he's going to get some stick from here on in. Fans have said almost from the word go that he isn't good enough. Missing a sitter at Wembley will not be forgiven by far too many people to ever see him look comfortable in a Reds' shirt again. I would never boo a player, but neither will I keep applauding and trying to spur on someone I think isn't good enough.

He tries, and against Chlesea he looked capable of living up to the 'potential' tag people keep labelling him with. Sadly, I think that was a one off.

I'm tired. I'm talking B*ll*cks.

 

I do and he tries very hard but he isn't good enough..

...I want him to prove me wrong but it just doesn't add up.</p>

As for stan, I always thought we should have signed Pete as well, maybe we would have if SD had known that Nads was to jump ship.</p>

</p>

</p>

</p>

</p>

 

What he needs to do is learn the fine art of hiding, its worked for many a player down years. If you try and miss you get abuse if you hide you don't.

 

i dont think i would but there you go

 

No he wasn't, he singled out his defence for coping so well with him nt

 

KO puts plenty of effort in and he certianly causes opposition defences problems. He's big, physical, wins his fair share of headers whereas none of our other strikers give us any aerial threat at all. Unfortunately he just hasn't got it in front of goal and as a striker I'm afraid you need that to some degree surely! The other strikers - and I include Macken in this as well - haven't done enough in my view either. KO's physical prescence should have led to his strike partners scoring more goals, but they either haven't had enough opportunities (Coulson and Christiensen) or enough ability (Macken and Nardiello) to get on the end of things. All adds up to a really poor return and we've been relying on goals from midfield. Something must change...and soon.