Why I hope the Blunts win their case against West Ham.

</p>

Well ok, there is one provision and that's that we do quite well this season.</p>

The whole of the Blunts case is based around their calculations of what West Ham would have achieved without Tevez's goals. Surely then, if we can establish blame against Sheff Utd, it's only fair that a similar formula is applied to calculate what we would have achieved with Iain Hume's. If the result is promotion then West Ham might as well just make the cheque out to us.</p>

The decision to &quot;go with what we've got&quot; may yet prove to be a very shrewd one.</p>

 

This is why the whole 'Tevez affair' is a farce and should be dismissed outright.

 

Glad to see that Don .

you admit you was wrong and that simon was right
to explain you got it wrong is not a bad thing just show's you can be humble.

 

And they may yet be hoist by their own petard, Sweet, nt

 

Simon was right about what Glynn?

If those were the reasons you don't think the decision was his do you?

 

He's floundering

Since his take on the Hume T-shirts was shown up to be nothing more than a petty jibe at you, and the BBS world saw what a weak minded mean spirited little pale imitation of a man he is.</p>

ps. heel snappers etc.
</p>