The best worst decision thread has got me thinking. Before his departure it seamed wiseman was the most disliked player at the club, since he left all this feeling seams to have transferred onto Kennedy. Is it's a simple question which player did you/do you prefer. Personally I'd rather have wiseman in the team any day of the week. He may not have quite had the ability but he was definitely more of a trier and did show signs of promise. Kennedy on the other hand has just left me with an image of him punting it down field burnt into my retinas
that is like having to choose between getting stabbed in the left eye or stabbed in the right eye !!! Oh and that tactic from Kennedy to O`Grady , down the left channel, kept us up last season !!
Kennedy still plays for us and to my knowledge he has never slagged us of although if I played for us and I read this board I would slag our fans off.
Neither, I'm afraid. If you put a gun to my head and said you have to make a choice, then you would have to shoot me. Two of the worst players EVER to play for BFC.
Yes Really. At least in the 70s they weren't getting paid 4-6 grand a week. Utter Utter dross for the wages they were/are on.
I was a big fan of Wiseman when he first arrived, he used to get forward with pace and put a decent cross in which sort of made up for any defensive frailties...for some reason he became equally bad at both (confidence?), his comments after he left were disappointing so it's a shame we didn't get rid sooner if that's how he felt.
It's a tough one, Wiseman better going forward but Kennedy the better of the two defensively. If we're been honest neither come anywhere near our worst players ever. Look at some of the lads we signed but barely played even in recent years like Mido, El Hamouir, Rigters, Mossto
Possibly not but I didn't slag off Wiseman either, I just think there are too many posts having a go at individuals.