<span lang="EN-GB">BARNSLEY Chairman Gordon Shepherd has today confirmed that talks are continuing over Andy Ritchie's new contract at Oakwell.</span></p> <span lang="EN-GB">Mr Shepherd told www.barnsleyfc.co.uk this morning: "I met with Andy's agent yesterday and our discussions are continuing"</span></p> <span lang="EN-GB"><table class="caption" style="WIDTH: 344px; HEIGHT: 154px" cellspacing="0" width="344" align="center" border="0"><tbody><tr><td class="captionText"><div class="innerCaptionText"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; COLOR: red; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> <span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: red; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></span></p> <span style="FONT-SIZE: 8pt; COLOR: red; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">©www.barnsleyfc.co.uk 2006 RNK</span></p></span></div></td></tr></tbody></table></span></p> <span lang="EN-GB"></span> </p>
If we lose again Should we really be rewarding the manager with a new contract? I dunno, I certainly don't think Ritchie should be sacked, but if I were the chairman I'd be a bit reticent to offer a new contract to a manager who had lost 8 of the last 9 games. Think I'd wait and see if results improved.
Unless GS has been quaffing pims with Dave Allen recently and sharing ideas on contract t&c's for football league managers.
I think that's what will happen. Surely on AR's agents brief is the level of severance payment...he might even delay signing a new contract if the new one has less favourable terms than his current deal
8 months left on his original contract, thats enough................ massive mistake giving him any longer.
tend to agree interesting how views change-not so long ago there were people clamouring for GS to sort it out and GS was criticised for saying there was plenty of time and he had been negotiating contracts for years-fickle fans aren't we!
RE: tend to agree I still think AR should get a new contract, and I'd be amazed if GS did not protect the interests of the club in the eventuality of AR leaving either way
RE: If we lose again All you are doing in your Should-Ritchie-Get-A-Contract posts is substituting the numbers, so your next post will no doubt be "9 out of 10", though not for originality. Contracts mean little in a football context anyway.If (LSD inspired example)Man United wanted Ritchie, would he stay?
They're important in two ways How much money we pay to sack him and how much compo we get if another club wants him.