with a website that looks like it was put together by a blind dog with a 10 year old copy of front page?</p> http://www.socialist-labour-party.org.uk/ </p>
Just checked: <pre><<span class="start-tag">meta</span><span class="attribute-name"> name</span>=<span class="attribute-value">"GENERATOR" </span><span class="attribute-name">content</span>=<span class="attribute-value">"Microsoft FrontPage 6.0"</span>></pre><pre>Frontpage 6 = 2003. So 6 years old. The dog might only be partially sighted then. </pre>
Well, it's the policy of the party that matters most here, so yes. Having said that, I have refused to shop with companies who have **** web sites.
But to be in politics there has to be a certain level of professionalism. And in the internet age, communication is vital. </p> I just thought it looked shocking that somebody would be happy with that as their image on a major election day. </p>
If you prefer style over substance.... I doubt they have anythinh like even the BNP in terms of resource. The party election broadcast was quite slick though.
RE: If you prefer style over substance.... I was looking through the list of parties and their websites for a reason to vote for one of them. That website was instantly a reason not to. If they can't even get a simple website that doesn't look like it was put together 10 years ago, giving me a simple overview and reason to back them, what hope do they have. They may have the best policies in the world, but if they can't communicate them to the voters, they are on a hiding to nothing. Its not about style over substance. We live in an information age, I want reason to vote for them, not an instant reason not to. Resources or not. That is just shabby.
Standard white background, black text and default blue links would be nicer, not as harsh on the eyes.</p> I like the "Designed by Michael Clifford Kerry" bit. Designed? </p> </p>
