you recently have been saying some things that have concerned me regarding BFC. Firstly it was RNL and Keith Hill don't get along. I don't agree there. I have listened to not Hill but the assistant and he can't be more encouraging to him. The thing that concerns me more is this about Hassell. You are half saying things. Just come out and say it because from the very outside it sounds like leaked info might be getting passed. If and its a big IF keith Hill or more importantly Pat Cryne believes its from within the playing squad then that player could be in big trouble. I think its a sackable offence and even if they can't prove it then things could be made very hard for that player like a certain Iain hume was at Preston.
Dont' bite Whitey. He accused someone else the other day about leaks coming from the club. Just trying to stir up trouble
I don't think its him Bryn. I would be very surprised if anyone from the playing squad was silly enough to do it.
Pretty much yes. Hemsworth is suggesting that Bobby has been leaking sensitive information about the club and as such should be sacked.
Lying barsteward. You know full well that you are attempting to show that Bobby has been leaking information and should be sacked and that even if it can't be proven then things could and should be made hard for him. by repeating the rumours and trying to make a big deal out of it you are attempting to ensure that the the club are made aware of the rumours and that they get back to the owner and the manager so that action can be taken. You will now deny this but we all know what your agenda is so you might as well save your energy and not bother arguing because nobody will believe you. Wolf wolf, help, wolf wolf. thats you that is.
This is internet gossip gone mad. Who really gives a toss? Does anyone really think this is the first time there has been a conflict of personalities at a football club? Time was, that to get any thoughts and opinions into print and for it to be read, you would have to hold some position in the journalistic or literary professions. And to do that you would first have to possess a reasonable modicum of credibility, be relatively good at what you do and be literate. Now any forumite can run away at the mouth, posting, tweeting and blogging away, claiming to know this and that without any discipline, discretion or even the most modest respect for the forum they are using - by that I mean the internet. They are on-line, so because they can, they do - then you put them on the spot and suddenly they clam up. I can't reveal my source? Gimme a fcking break already! Are people really that desperate for attention? Go and do something genuinely creative and don't depend on the internet to give you a personality or some sort of social standing. At least Kipper gave us all a laugh. And for the record - I know absolutely fck all about the comings and goings at Barnsley Football Club. So don't ask. (This is not aimed at any particular person, it's just my cultural take on the whole open access, social media phenomenon.)
If not getting along with Coach or captain meant you didn't play then shane warne and KP wouldn't have played 20 test between them.
I congratulate you on your ability to sum up my thoughts to a tee. An analogy may be that, when the sun shines although the clinically obese can wear skimpy tops and shorts, it doesn't mean they should. (unless they are in Barnsley town centre )
All circumstances are different. For every example of a player not being dropped due to personal issues there are other examples showing the opposite.
