Has Jay been banned?

A serious question as he's been significantly absent from the forum since he made that insulting and provocative post some days ago. Or is it a self banning knowing quite well that he will be asked to answer for his actions if he ever reappeared?

I am curious to know his reasons for re-igniting something that was already dead and buried, Doctor Z had learnt his lesson and was complying with forum rules, yet he thought it apt to provoke him and start a thread which inevitably put pressure on Gally to ban him again, which was quite bizarre in itself. I'm wondering if Jay is a close friend of Gally or a relation, brother-in-law or even sister because all this has a real bad smell to it.

Just curious

 

It's Gally's forum, we are all his guests so he can do as he wishes.

 

He didn't have a go at Dr Zazlos. He had a go at the people who overreacted to the Fleetwood game. The people who are constantly negative about everything and constantly demand Johnson (or any other manager) to be sacked because he said it is driving people away and ruining this place. A point many posters absolutely agree with and have said many times.

As it happens Dr Zazlos was fairly measured after Fleetwood and wasn't mentioned once in Jay's post. All you're seeking to do is pursue your own agenda against Jay.

If people like Jay aren't on this forum we might as well shut it down now.

 

It's a Galliphate where non believers disappear. You have to be radicalised to post on here.

 

Oh so Jay is immune from a banning because someone thinks he's better than everyone else? Sums this place up really.


Sent from mi bloody iPhone

 

I think people saw what they wanted to see in Jay's post.

 

So what insulting and provocative post was that then? I think some folk wad trying to find something in that post that wasn't there, for the record I think Dr Zazlos should be allowed back on, I suppose I'm biased cos I really like the bloke.

 

'A real bad smell about it'

About an internet message board that you've posted less than a thousand times on.

Pack it in, FFS. Everyone.

 

No, he's immune because he's done nothing wrong. That's why he's immune.

 

Well in that case DrZazlos has done nothing wrong and should be immune.


Sent from mi bloody iPhone

 

Jay simply had the guts to write what many on here were thinking anyway. His post wasn't provocative at all, it was 100% correct. The constant repetition of the same stuff was mind-numbing and ruining the forum. Once all the dust has settled it will be a far better place.

 

No, he's consistently spoiled this place for 90% of folk by saying the same f.cking thing on 90% of his posts. It's been an attention seeking masterclass and I bet you that deep down he's f.cking loving everyone still talking about him.

 

No he called out those who had a differing opinion. Most of the posters who had a differing opinion were offering praise throughout Saturday's result, none more so that DrZ and rightly so. Just because Jay thinks LJ shouldn't be sacked doesn't mean everyone else should. People have differing viewpoints, that's he whole point of the place. Gally has a responsibility to police it the correct way, DrZazlos has been unfairly treated, simple as that.


Sent from mi bloody iPhone

 

Admittedly he was guilty to that a few months ago, he was banned for that, then reinstated with the promise that he behaves himself, he has done.
You're getting mixed up with thereev.


Sent from mi bloody iPhone

 

He's never going to be allowed back on here, so why don't you just get over it?

 

No I'm not.

 

Besides how would you know these past few weeks when you've been on honeymoon?


Sent from mi bloody iPhone

 

He might aswell if he's not going to run the place properly. What's the point of putting rules in place?


Sent from mi bloody iPhone

 

"Insulting and provocative post"

Oh give over.

Or is sticking up for Lee Johnson in the face of what's been fired at him so controversial ?