Ipswich or Brizzle. I would take him back. Confidence looked shot last night. Sent via Royal Mail and typed up by my Tapatalk byatch
I think he's a great player with a great attitude. Definitely worth signing as we won't have Kent probably after this season.
I'm clinging on to the fact that his profile is all about us and he likes and retweets BFC things all the time. Plus the day Davies signed his extension he posted a pic of him and Isgrove and Isgrove retweeted it. Probably means nowt but if Lloyd has a say in it then you'd hope he'd pick us.
His final day with us last season gave him memories to last a lifetime. We seem to have found a similar type of player and grafter in Kent so would we really want to have both? Kent seems to be improving every week as did Izzy last year so I'd stick with Kent. See what happens at the end of this season and if things go well we may get chance to sign kent. Which would you prefer full time... Kent or Izzy... or both?
Can't agree on that. Isgrove works alot harder and is a lot better tracking back. Personally I'd prefer Izzy full time
was absolutely awful under LJ while playing is crap 1 up front tactics. I wanted him sending back. If I was Isgrove i'd be asking LJ what the chances of him playing 442 were, if slim id I wouldn't entertain a move to Bristol
If he wants to come under our existing pay structure I'd welcome him with open arms. If he has to think about it ,move on.
Does anyone actually know how much we pay our best players at Barnsley? Re Izzy not being need because we have Kent - the latter is just a loan, as is Armstrong. To state the obvious they are not our players and there'll be on their way end of season. I would defo take Lloyd back.
If Watkins stays then I would be surprised if we recruited Isgrove as well. As mentioned on here, I don't think he falls into our wage structure. Very talented and suits our style of play but I think there are more cost effective signings out there.