Davis. G. Jones. RB. McDonald. CH. Roberts. CH. Elder. LB. James. CM. Scowen. CM. Hammell. RM. Kent. LM. Watkins.S. Bradshaw. S.
Bradshaws all round game is better, and he is our player. If watkins is upfront bradshaw should partner him. I don't mind armstrong him and winnall was a poor partnership but he has pace to burn probley should have had at least 2 v Rotherham. But like I say for me if Marley's up top bradshaw should be partnering him.
I think this is what we should go for, just swap Kent and Hammill around, Adam is always better cutting in on his right than he his trying to beat a full back for pace.
Ok Murder (soz I mean that backwards lol). I also like the fact that Bradshaw is ours longer term etc, but on the back of his winner at Rotherham I wouldn't have dropped Armstrong. The fact that Hecky dropped them BOTH however for just Watkins, in a home game against an average and overly physical team, its just inexcusable really.
Davies Jones, Roberts, MacDonald, Elder Watkins, James, Scowen, Kent Armstrong & Bradshaw I really believe Armstrong, Kent & Bradshaw could and should be key players and we have not yet seen or got the best out them. Remember Sam Winnowt played week in out and took a while to get going. Meanwhile Armstrong and Bradshaw have been in and out the side. They need to get a run of games! As for Kent, he has had a good few weeks both scoring and picking up assists. Also links well with Armstrong.
Kent for Hammill. I like Adam but he's better coming on later. Armstrong too is good from the bench with Watkins and Bradshaw up top. 442 no faffing about. Hopefully it was a learning curve for Hecky that lineup v Wolves. Modest changes yes but drastic, no.
