Bradders off to Millwall

It's never been about your opinion per se, it's the way you go about expressing it and the timing of it. You come across as an ungrateful insensitive pillock. I'd put you in a room with the Cryne family and see if you're quite so mouthy.

 

Is this a serious post?

To be honest I haven't said half of what I really think.

 

I want us to keep Bradshaw. Not just for the potential goals he could get, but because IMO he's one of the few existing players who could fit straight into a high-pressing system. His fitness has never been an issue, neither his work-rate.

If he does go, at least it's good to see we're not selling to the first club offering a tenner and a bag of wine gums.

 

Some interesting thoughts. I think you are confusing socialism with communism in terms of individualism & it is the total opposite to fascism.
The Labour Party is a highly democratic party, as are most modern parties in the UK.

The idea that any player we have in our current squad is irreplaceable isn't true. Bradshaw only has 1 year on his contract.
He either signs a new one, or we sell him for a decent fee. If not he walks at the end of the season & should we be promoted we'd be then looking for a new striker who is championship level. At least if he goes now we have the chance to integrate someone at L1 level, who could possibly move up. I'm not convinced he will fit our system anyway. He is an old school fox in the box type striker, not very mobile & no good as a hold up player.
Moore fits both bills to some degree & we have him on a longer contract, so I'd only expect him to go if the money was very good & is head was turned by the move.

As I posted on another thread, all this type of speculation is utter horse manure, the manager has only been official in post 5 days.
The club isn't spoon feeding anybody as far as I'm aware, all this rubbish is coming from Twitter.

 

Good post, Spider. I tend to have a knee jerk reaction to some of your posts which I find to be on the negative side. I'm sure you're likewise with mine being seen as too positive.
I'll be happy to pass a judgement on the new owners at the end of the season. I think now is way too soon.
Can't fault the way you've stated your case though. You have valid points.

 

Noted today that Peterboro have had a £750 k bid for Doncasters John Marquis turned down , thats the kind of figures deemed not good enough for a player who has just had an average season in division one , we have a championship striker on our books in Bradshaw , to replace him , should he go , will cost a lot of dosh , to me we should not even consider it.

 

Really? We'll see, they're turning down £1 million pound bids in League 1 so that's a different strategy straight away.

 

Jeez !!!!

 

Obviously.
Of course it is.
We should be rejoicing that a £2 million bid has been turned down.
That’s totally different from the Cryne era.
Have people already forgotten the stack um high sell um cheap strategy that existed during the last ownership.
Why can’t people see that.
There are some really thick foookers on here.
I hope no one connected to the club reads this message board.
It’s often very embarrassing.

 

??

 

Edit - Apologies, for some reason, despite the title of the thread, I had it in my mind people were talking about Moore

 

Roll on the transfer window closing. We'll have to be patient to see if our 'new' owners act similarly to PC, Some of our best stars were sold in the January window. These names below had a major (goal scoring/team) negative impact once sold while we were still in the Championship.

Hamill (2011)
Haynes (2012)
Vaz Te (2012)

2014 relegated as none of the above replaced with any quality which seemed to traumatize our goalkeeper and captain

Half the team (2017)
2018 relegated again as no experienced replacements bought in(or those bought in not given enough chances) + a suspect gk.

 

I’m not sure I’d count Danny Haynes as a major loss. McIndoe and Davies were bigger losses in January.

 

Yes and good.