They eill.have made very little money from they concert I know a person who used to be in a the management team of kirkless stadium who.said they were not worth the effort
It's SCMP that applies to us this season and there's an easy way for them around that via donations and injections of equity (loans are not allowed)
I thought most clubs did. The bigger ones anyway. As to whether its a way round FFP, I don't know for sure.
I've no idea. I was commenting on the OPs suggestion that the owners themselves pay 10million as a way around financial fair play
I saw somewhere that the Football League(and maybe the Premier League) have rules about owner sponsorship when it comes to FFP and SCMP. Basically, they have a "going rate" for things like stadium and kit sponsorship, so even if an owner "paid" the club £100m to sponsor the stadium for a month, the league would only count said "going rate" when working out FFP/SCMP.
Yes, I believe this to be the case. They have general benchmark figures what is to be classed as market value of deals. Some may push the boundaries a bit - Man Utd & Man City etc, due to the size of the clubs, but it protects against daft deals.