If deposit is with a deposit protection scheme they should get it back. If it isnt you can take landlord for 3x the deposit. Dont back down.
Thanks for reply, There is nothing in the tenancy agreement to say who it is with (or if there is one), and nothing on the website The students have not been told who the TDS is with. However, he's a slippery so-and so, and probably has it covered somehow. It says in the Student tenancy agreement : "The tenancy created by this agreement is an assured shorthold tenancy within the meaning of the Housing Act" The section entitled Deposit states: " Where required, the deposit shall be protected as required, under the Housing Act 2004, in which case the tenants agree, that the lead tenant shall be (insert name) " We've looked at Gov.uk re deposits. We understand they should have been notified within 35 days which scheme it is with. None of them know, or can find out who it's with.
If they weren't notified that is all the ground they need to be able to sue (although it can be tricky to prove you didn't receive anything). They should have been given some paper with the details on within the first 35 days. If they phone the 3 schemes they will be able to tell them on the phone whether they are registered or not. If they are not registered then it is a cut and dried case and they will be awarded anything from 1x - 3x the deposit value in compensation, plus they should get the deposit back minus any fair deductions. They will need to serve a notice before action to the landlord 14 days before they take action and if they have proof of his being horrible to them then I have no doubt that they will be awarded the full amount. Edited to say that it is literally not his decision whether they get the deposit back or not and he shouldn't even be entering into discussions with them of that nature. When a tenancy ends, the tenant asks the scheme for the deposit back and the landlord has to submit evidence of any deductions he wants to make, which the scheme will consider. If he doesn't submit anything, or they think it is bogus then the whole amount will be returned. There should be no discussion back and forth between the tentant and landlord as it is not their decision to make.
T Thank you Jam Drop, that is pretty much as we expected. We need to establish whether the students want to take action. I think that's half the issue - these landlords are basically making money out of apathetic students who don't have the confidence to tackle this head on.
Please encourage them to take the action, they are guaranteed by law to win if they are not registered with the schemes and it will punish him and make him less likely to try it on with anyone else if he has to pay 3x the total of their deposits. There are templates online to help those who are unsure how to proceed, it's quite simple and they never have to go to court or anything, it is all just paperwork.
Thanks again. Using the details we have, we have just checked the three schemes and they are not protected with any of them.
I'm not sure if you saw my edit above: Edited to say that it is literally not his decision whether they get the deposit back or not and he shouldn't even be entering into discussions with them of that nature. When a tenancy ends, the tenant asks the scheme for the deposit back and the landlord has to submit evidence of any deductions he wants to make, which the scheme will consider. If he doesn't submit anything, or they think it is bogus then the whole amount will be returned. There should be no discussion back and forth between the tentant and landlord as it is not their decision to make. As the deposit is not protected (which is was pretty clear that it wasn't when he was trying to bargain/blackmail them in the first place) then suing him is the only way to get it back, plus it gives the bonus of up to 3x the amount extra as punishment to the landlord. I will try and dig back out the help and advice I got before when I was considering doing it.
@fired All the steps are here: https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/tenancy_deposits/tenancy_deposit_compensation_claims Unfortunately, there is a cost of around £300 if you have to take it to the courts (that pretty much always means just means send the paperwork, not attend) but the landlord will have to pay that on your behalf when it is sorted. If he is as big a coward as I imagine he is, a letter before action will get him to cough up.
Me and my other half are all over this, and are willing to stump it up just to take the slimey sod on. Need to get the three students up for it. It's not about money anymore, it's about the principle. Just need to make sure we have our facts right before we go headlong into this. When they moved in, the house was a disgrace. Me and my sister had to clean it from top to bottom to make it habitable. We took photos etc. He's now witholding the deposit for some cleaning! It is a million times better than when they arrived. I'm tempted to send him an invoice for our time.
That's total exploitation. But the fun doesn't stop when you're a student. If you move to a city, even with 'generous' landlords the cost of renting is sky high. They can charge what they want (even with the protection of no agency fees etc.) and without the bank of mum and dad you're in for a struggle. Saving for a deposit without any help is beyond some people, and landlords in certain cities (I.e. Bristol) are having a field day and lapping it up.
I would be the exact same as you, like you say - it's the principle! Even if he returned the deposit I'd be tempted to get him for not protecting it anyway (which is the law) and causing all this hassle by being a sod about it. I hate people like him.
Last thing, this page is also useful as you've got two separate problems here 1) the original deposit and 2) compensation for it not being protected. This page is more information about getting the original deposit back whereas the link above was just about the compensation https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/tenancy_deposits/how_to_get_your_tenancy_deposit_back
That's fantastic news. He hasn't got a leg to stand on. I'd definitely echo JD and recommend going through the courts for this. We had a huge issue with a landlord a few years ago (everything up to and including a rat infestation) and we just wanted out so once we clocked that he hadn't protected the deposits we quoted the law and said we wouldn't report him if he paid us them back in full and we could just leave the next day. He backed down immediately. In a way it's a shame he got away with it, but at least we had somewhere else lined up. If we'd already been out then we'd 100% have gone ahead with legal action.