Anyone who's pursued the same woman since 1938 without getting his leg over, deserves whatever kind of sexual release he can find.
If you ever need reminding that you're not a c.un.t - read the comments section on any Daily Mail story and revel in knowing you are a decent human compared to 99% of the cretins who post on there.
I did this for a laugh - this comment in particular made me laugh "That's an absolute insult and I for one will be cancelling everything to do with Marvel and associates if they bring that story line in." Marvel ...
I don't as a rule read the site but thought I'd have a look at the comments. I clicked 'worst rated comments" and saw the first few weren't abusive, then I realised what site I was on and clicked "best rated comments". Christ almighty.
Someone's sexuality is totally different to their gender. A gay man is still a man. A lesbian is still a woman. If they do not feel they identify as a man or woman then that isn't anything to do with who they prefer sexually. Nothing has changed, people just kept it to themselves because it wasn't tolerated before. You only have to read this board sometimes to see it still isn't now. People act as if nobody was gay or bisexual 50 years ago- they most definitely were.
I'm really sorry I'm not on the same intellectual witty level as you, then. I honestly couldn't give a **** about batsmen being branded batters. Would you want to be called a dinnerlady or lollipop lady if you were a bloke? I guess not. Why should a lass be called a linesman? The world has changed. Woman are allowed to work now and get jobs blokes used to do, crazy isn't it? If that's the biggest issue bothering you today then lucky you. Get a grip.