Not for me, McGeehan is back for Saturday and our midfield has good backups from bench like Green etc We've missed Moore more cos only replacement for him is Adeboyejo
Article in Transfer Tavern implies that Kieffer and not Cauley was our " main man." I feel that before Kieffer was injured, apart from their goals, they were both as important to us in slightly different ways. It rightly says that in the seven games since Moore has been missing, we've failed to score in four of them. In my view, that could be down to the opposition and how they set up to prevent us from scoring, plus there's nothing whatsoever to prove that had Kieffer been available to play, we might have fared any better really. Be interested to hear any other views. https://www.footballtransfertavern....es/tt-battle-cauley-woodrow-vs-kieffer-moore/
For me it was the differences in each other’s game that defenders couldn’t get a grip with that complimented each other’s ability to take opportunities . Whilst they were wrestling with Moore who was a handful Cauley snuck in or was laid on with a through or loose ball . Or if defenders concentrated on Cauleys runs Moore could capitalise on some less pressurised marking he would normally deal with as a lone striker .