Not for Brexiteers: For Remainers/Pro-Europeans only

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Orsen Kaht, Dec 9, 2016.

  1. ark

    ark104 (v2) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    6,202
    Likes Received:
    1,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    York
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Wouldn't need anything like that either. All it is giving is UK citizens the benefits of EU citizenship, not any of the funding. The only debate would be whether they'd be offered the current reciprocal healthcare we benefit from now. Again this would be so small in terms of EU budget spend, but if that right was removed from our EU citizenship I think we'd all understand.

    Effectively the cost would be a small administrative one, more than offset against the cost of processing tourist and work visas for non EU British citizens which would cost member states far more.
     
  2. sadbrewer

    sadbrewer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Messages:
    9,243
    Likes Received:
    4,311
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    According to the Guardian this morning it's off . It would need a wholesale change to the existing treaties , and Guy Verhofstadt has been told it's not only impractical but would make The EU appear weak .
     
  3. Marc

    Marc Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2012
    Messages:
    26,764
    Likes Received:
    19,920
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Pie in the sky, obviously. Still more than the actual Brexit plan though.
    Hard Brexit. Red white & blue Brexit. Taking back control. That's literally the plan right now. Clueless before, clueless now.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  4. CrossTyke

    CrossTyke Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2014
    Messages:
    990
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    So you think we should have adopted the Euro then ?
     
  5. BBB

    BBBFC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2015
    Messages:
    731
    Likes Received:
    750
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Hindsight is 20:20.

    Had we been members of the euro we'd have had a lot more influence over the last 15 years, whereas because we didn't join we've been marginalised in a lot of decision-making due to that.

    However, due to the strength of the pound throughout that time, it would've been daft to adopt the euro as it would've had several negative effects on Britain as a whole.

    A combination of the two has probably left Britain in the position it is today, a place where EU migrants want to come because the base pay is worth more than it is back home, (and one of the most developed nations in the EU) and Britain is in good stead compared to the remainder of the EU (Ireland, Greece, Portugal, Spain), but we want to leave to protect this advantage, despite the almost definite short to medium term negative consequences of doing so.
     
  6. Sco

    Scoff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    8,314
    Likes Received:
    6,741
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    The interface between business and technology
    Location:
    Brampton by the Sea
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Personally I wanted to at the time, but I understand that it would have been very unpopular and a majority of people would have been against it. With hindsight, taking up the Euro and being one of the 3 main powers in the EU (with Germany and France) we could have forged it more to our ideals rather than following behind. However, as usual our politicians are more concerned with short-term interests than the big picture.

    At the moment, the drop in value of the £ has made it more attractive for Brits to work across Europe compared to colleagues paid in Euros, just as we are about to lose the right to work across Europe.
     

Share This Page