Police why?

Stan Collymore? You mean the same guy who beat Ulrika Jonsson to a pulp? Well if Stan is the moral compass that you follow then no wonder you post the drivel that you do.

 

Odd that... because my old man who is a retired copper was jumping for joy that the truth had come out and the cover up finally exposed.

He wants those responsible within the Police Federation to pay with criminal charges for their actions since that day at Hillsbrough.

So clearly not all police and ex police fit the stereotype that you create.

 

Shame so many in the police force sat on that information for so long, despite many knowing the truth. It wouldnt have taken much for officers on the day to get together and speak out about it, instead many allowed their statements to be changed (200+ of them) and went along with the whole charade.

Shameless *******$.

 

You make a serious statement about his "serious mental health" and then tell him to "get a job, get a life, Loser"

WTF?

 

The deceased should have stopped when ordered. With so many immigrants in the UK, many of whom with mal-intent, a hard line has to be taken. It is not the 1950s where people respected the police and aided them. It is the 21st century where they get it in the neck from all areas.

 

You on about Mark Duggan?

 

To be fair if anybody other than Hemsworth had posted this the majority would probably be in agreement (well the bit about tasering the blind guy anyway) ffs did you see him on the news a bloody err blind man could see he was no threat to anybody.

 

It was awful and a tragedy. I think context has to be taken into account. Iit was straight after the London bombings. The officers involved did not know whether they were about to be blown to bits along with innocent passengers. It was a mistake with tragic consequences. It is easy to have hind sight and dispassionately accuse the officers but at that time they had a decision to make, unfortunately they got it wrong.

 

Sorry but in my opinion thats a load of s*h*i*t*

Can we say that about people in Afgan. They've killed British troops because they've killed innocent members of the public there? NO.

 

ffs HT will you ever learn?!?

 

Google the name Ben Parkinson.

 

Not the force - the Police Federation.

The statements of the rank and file officers were changed under extreme duress from their superiors within the Police Federation.

 

Extreme duress?

 

Either you're purposely peddling lies or you are ignorant enough to believe the lies put out by the police, all of which have been proven to be so, time and time again. Which is it?

 

Jean Charles was not asked to stop by police. He did not jump a barrier, did not run from police, was not here illegally and was not wearing a bulky jacket. His only crime was to look "slinty eyed" and be suspected of being a terrorist by police unable to do their job.

Despite the concern over him carrying explosives the police allowed him on to a bus, then into a tube station, then onto a tube train. Only then did they decide he needed to be shot dead by putting over half a dozen shots into his brain as he was dragged from his seat and executed by the state whilst kneeling on the floor.

 

correct in my minds thats murder.

 

Google the name Keith Blakelock.

 

Google the name Johnson Beharry.

 

Because the state has a monopoly on violence, proving they have murdered someone is particularly difficult. Especially so when a chain of command means blame can be spread about. But yes, by any sensible definition he was murdered.