Because he has an agenda i.e. anti Asian. If he was targeting every race, creed, colour then fair enough but he doesnt because he's vile and wants to stir up anti-Asian sentiment.
Hardly tiny though when you think of how much violence this religion breeds. This is a religion that calls for the killing of gay people, it’s also a religion that calls for mass murder of innocents (9/11, 7/7, 22/3, 22/5, Lee Rigby ETC) and also one that advocates inequality. Maybe inequality is a poor example but I’m pro equal rights and always will be so had to get that in there. I agree that all Muslims aren’t terrorists but that being said, most terrorist attacks/atrocities are conducted by Muslims so it’s quite clear why some may be against it.
By the way if this is one of your hilarious windups then it really isnt funny. Muslims aren't terrorists or paedophiles, just as priests aren't truly catholic if they abuse children. Their religions don't advocate hurting others, it can be twisted as much as you like but the whole 'not all muslims are terrorists but...' comment is just the kind of stupid, ignorant comment that makes me ashamed of our country when i hear people spout it.
Does it look or sound like a wind up when everything incident mentioned by myself was by Muslims and are stone cold facts?... just so you know, yes I am aware that Christian mass murder does happen and I’m against it wholeheartedly but it’s very rare in this country and if you knew your facts, you’d know this. I’d stick to reading the Guardian in your lefty bubble fella...
ALL religion breeds violence in some form or another. There are 2 billion Muslims in the world. How many Muslim terrorists are there? In the UK there have been 2 terror attacks in the last year. 1 out of 2 were Muslim. In the last 5 years its 3 out of 6 In the last 10 years its 4 from 8. The last 20? 5 from 15
More people have been killed by the IRA than Isis so not rare in the slightest, if you knew your facts you'd know this
Have you ever heard of the "no true Scotsman" fallacy? Essentially the hypothesis is that no Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge, until you meet a Scotsman who in fact does have sugar on his porridge. He's simply dismissed because "no TRUE Scotsman has sugar on his porridge". http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/...ligion-politics-society-beliefs-about-sharia/ If you look at those figures, you'll see large percentages of Muslims believe that stoning should be the punishment for adultery. You'll see that large numbers believe that death should be the punishment for leaving Islam. Or hows about https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...se-of-belonging-poll-homosexuality-sharia-law where over half of British Muslims think being gay should be illegal. Yeah there might only be a few terrorist attacks, but they come from a religion where tens, if not hundreds, of millions of people hold truly abhorrent views, and which provides the necessary underlying atmosphere to foment extremism. If you come from a culture where large numbers of people are telling you that it's okay to kill apostates, or throw rocks at women, or execute homosexuals on a daily basis, then it's not difficult to see how that climate might lead to somebody committing terrorism. And while they may just be a one-off, pretending they aren't representative of Islam is silly.
Why does it need "reporting on"? They've been arrested and brought to trial. I find many aspects of Islam misogynistic, homophobic, and generally extremely unpleasant. Likewise quite a few denominations of Christianity for that matter. But "Robinson" is a complete arse, with no interest in reasoned debate, only stirring up hatred and violence against an entire group of people. What's more, under UK law, the defendants are right now considered to be innocent.
Youd hope so. Only about a 1/3 of convictions for the rotherham Cse cases made the press. You can go back before that to the first cases that became public knowledge. It was the actions of the then far right mouth piece Nick Griffin that brought them to the attention of a larger audience. Derby. Oxford. Then theres the dogs abuse ann cryer got for raising the issue in the early 2000s about the going ons in keighley rather than taking the concerns seriously.
At last a post of yours i agree on. Seriously, the guy is a racist nut job, who was jeopardising the trial of these despicable individuals. He then turned violent, like morons like him do. End of story.
An attention seeking wannabe with a clear agenda. He is no Angel as well. Arrested on numerous occasions .
No I don't.... I'm well aware what this parasite is and I was actually being kind calling him an idiot!