I don't mind the odd cyclist riding on his own. But it does my fecking head in when you get a group of them insisting on riding 3 side by side through winding roads. No consideration for car drivers what so ever. The roads between Fev and ackworth are ridiculous, it's illegal to ride 3 abreast and 2 on narrow roads, but some cyclist don't seem to give **** and don't care that there's a queue of cars behind them
I don't cycle and never have any trouble with cyclists. The vast majority seem like very good road users to me. Unsurprising really, they're vulnerable so they take care. Can't say the same about some of the car drivers who pass them.
well if all cyclist have the same attitude as you, then there's no wonder this thread is 4 pages long
I've driven hundreds of thousands of miles since I first passed my test - I've also ridden a fair few miles on a pushiron. It seems to me that the majority of car drivers seem to think the road traffic laws apply to everyone else but them. Examples of poor driving seen daily: Driving too close to the vehicle in front Speeding Driving the wrong way down a one way street Driving whilst under the influence On the Phone whilst driving Some drivers seem to think that because it's a 30/40/50/60/70 mph road that is the speed you have to do - well it isn't - it is the maximum, yes maximum that you can legally go. Cyclists have as much right on the correct roads as anyone else - so can we drop the holier than thou attitude and give them some consideration, please! Arriving at your destination a few seconds later never hurt anyone, ever.
its actually dangerous to drive slower than the speed limit, especially on a motorway. A one from ponte just got 6 years for causing death by driving too slow. so actually you are supposed to drive the correct speed if possible. If cyclist didn't ride 2/3 abreast on winding narrow roads there wouldn't be a problem
Anyone who uses a propelled mode of transport be it car bike scooter or chartiot should have as a minimum third party cover.
A lot of car drivers do ride bikes. I actually used to give a lift to work (car share scheme) to a bloke who rides a bike a lot and he commented about poor cycling on a couple of occasions. As I've said earlier I accept that there is poor car driving out there but the reaction from cyclists to the mere suggestion that cyclists can cause problems suggests that understanding isn't both ways.
totally serious offer. i'll happily meet with anyone on this thread, and go out on the bike for an hour. i'll learn more about what frustrates you, and you'll hopefully learn more about what it's like to be on the road on a bike.
You can fail a driving test these days for going 20 in a 30, 30 in a 40 etc, so your point has no weight behind it at all.
Only if you don't keep up with traffic AND it is safe to do so The faster one goes the less reaction time one has to react to anything. I think my point has plenty of weight behind it. Speed enough times and you get banned from driving - ever thought what the reason behind this is?
Death by slow driving? Was the motorist in the wrong lane? Did someone get frustrated and try to undertake? - So all the HGV's on a slow climb are driving dangerously on our motorways. Have a wild guess as to what causes more deaths on our roads excessively fast driving or excessively slow driving. It is not illegal to ride two abreast - if you can't see round a corner - slow down - apart from cyclists there are other potential hazards - prior collision, horses etc Next argument please Mr Clarkson/Hammond/May
Some drivers must get confused big-time if they have to wait to overtake a roadsweeper. Slower than a bike, takes up more space than 2/3 abreast, and it's got an engine, insurance, emissions duty.........