I would imagine the path to go down is to not bring stuff up from the past if you don't want it brought up? Not bring it up, then when questioned say you don't want it bringing up, even though it was you who brought it up in the first place. Back on topic, Rodgers is clearly in the wrong. To say "good girl" is at best patronising to say the least.
1. The reason was pertinent to me and I wasn't thinking I needed to go into it. End of 2. On the theme of addressing people. Was the question. I was then asked what it was about. I didnt want to discuss that side of it. End of. Nosey buggers. 3. I've put that In a previous post. That it was not appropriate after reading more up on the case.
Ok, I found the thread. I didn’t use the word thick to describe you, you used it to describe yourself. I did say ‘I'm only continuing this conversation because I prefer to believe you're daft rather than discriminatory but I'm starting to think that no-one can be this daft.’ Which I guess is the same thing but then you were defending calling people gypos when I was trying to explain that it was wrong so I’m not apologising for that. That aside though, what has that got to do with gegenpresser saying me using profanities in this thread is gross but it’s not when anyone else does it? I wasn’t ‘quoting your profanities’, clearly I swear too so why would I? I was making the point that 5 people in this thread so far have used them (including me and you) but only I got called out on it. It wasn’t it any way a dig at you as we both did the same thing, it was pointing out the double standards where the woman gets called out for saying the same thing that five men said.
Nosey buggers you've raised these accusations on a public forum, shall we all just close our eyes? What you should've done if you didn't want people asking questions or challenging you about these comments is raise them privately or don't raise them at all if you weren't going to elaborate?
So the ‘raking over old coals’ he didn’t want to do was him using blatantly discriminatory and legally deemed racist language, and him defending himself for doing so? And he was offended by someone calling him out on it at the time? For calling him ‘daft’? Absolute comedy gold. To be fair, I’d say using a racial slur and doubling down on it when it is pointed out to you makes you either thick, or a bigot. Maybe both. Take your pick Hooky Feller. And if you’re offended by this, so be it. There is no law dictating a right to not be offended.
The best bit is that it was three years ago. The person who thinks people shouldn’t get offended so easily has been harbouring a grudge for the past three years for being called ‘daft’.
None of what you say. So let's start off with you are a fekking liar. I'm none of those things you point out that's not what was said at the time and in not in a friendly gesture. So if you dont mind given you are talking out of your backside, and barking up the wrong tree. and dont know the full story. I dont care. And if you are offended I neither care or am interested what you have to say either. I have my reasons. Sorry if it upsets everyone. But that's my last word on the subject. Btw It was fekk all to to with any Racist. Misogynist. Homophobic comment on my part or Jamdrops. Or during the Titus remark. On my part. Which was based on an assumption and was doubled down on.
If that isn’t what was said at the time, then what was? That seems to be JamDrop’s recollection of events. What is yours? You are being very defensive here for someone with nothing to hide (about an interaction you don’t wish to discuss - but that you brought up).
Here’s the thread that’s sparked three years of secret resentment for anyone who wants to waste a bit of their life. Not sure why it’s been brought up now but at least you’ll all know what’s being talked about. https://barnsleyfc.org.uk/threads/ref-admits-mistake.300363/page-2
I've nothing to hide. I have written to jampdrop. It was forgotten on her part. Which I thought it wouldn't be and yes I was making a point. As for your defamatory post on myself. Bang out of order.