Agreed. He definitely took a shot, but no way was he working by himself. And let's ignore laddo in this thread, its actually got scope to be a good discussion.
There are two things that I distinctly remember but can't find any evidence of now. One is the pentagon, I remember seeing videos on the day itself of of eye witnesses who said they saw missiles hit the pentagon. Obviously we all know that eye witnesses are notoriously unreliable but I find it weird that the video interviews have basically disappeared. The other is that I distinctly remember a screenshot showing the underside of one of the planes and it had an additional bulge which matched with a where a military jet would carry missiles. Again I can't find that image anywhere these days. And it was accompanied by a grainy video showing something travelling in front of the plane and an explosion occuring when that object hit the tower before the plane did. No idea how fake they all were but I definitely remember them
The molten steel is the orange stuff in the photos. If you watch the second video I'm the Matt Le Tissier thread you will see footage of it spewing out of the side of the WTC building near where the thermite was detonated. I'm not here to convince you though. You are free to believe whatever version of events you choose to believe.
Your evidence that the beams melted into molten steel... Looks to me like it's a cropped version of this... Which looks an awful lot like it was taken in the same place as this image which doesn't look like ground zero to me...
Can you explain how CGI would have worked when hundreds (if not more) people would have been looking at the towers when the second plane hit?
Are you possibly suggesting that a picture on the Internet may not be factually representing what someone is implying?
Qanon, Flat Earthers etc. It's truly concerning what people allow themselves to be led into on the Internet.
On the contrary... If someone chooses to make repeated personal attacks against me without provocation there is every need. Besides, there is nothing said in that post that is as bad as he has aimed at me so I suggest you, and anybody else who sees fit to comment, considers the post in full context.
If casual tyke isn't banned for that person attack on Jay, any other warning or ban just needs to be questioned. The worst abuse I've seen on here from someone who comes out with this type of stuff time and time again, and then cries the victim when challenged. Get him off here once and for all.