how exactly do they show that he is the better tackler? To me your stats show that bobby hassell will only make a challenge when a one legged man could tackle. If I waited 70 minutes before bothering to attempt a tackle then I too would more than likely make sure that the one time i can be arsed to do my job i would get the ball. Which of the two strikers would you say have got the best shot? The bloke who got 3 in 3 on target? or the one that hit the target 9 times out of 37 shots?
RE: how exactly do they show that he is the better tackler? Logic would suggest that a player with a higher percentage of tackles won is the better tackler. Is that difficult for you to understand? </p> Togwell played 4 games more than Hassell so he must have spent more time running about doing nothing that Hassell.</p> What do you make of that supertyke.</p> </p>
VERY selective again JC. Keep going, you're making a tit of yourself Togwell spent LESS time on the pitch than bobby hassell did actually. Yes he appeared in more games but he only played more than 25 minutes in 11 games. He also played a few games on the right wing as a more attacking player rather than a defensive player who should be making tackles. and no, logic doesn't show that the person with a higher percentage of succesfull tackles is the better tackler. Only if you was to compare identical challenges in identical situations could you make that claim. Stop quoting statistics to try to prove your argument when you haven't thought them through. I have asked before and you ignored it. Do you have stats from individual games? Can you see how many challenges hassell made whilst in midfield. Another one for you, how many successfull forward passes did he make? I'll guess that it is less than 20.
odejayi = 4 in 45 = one goal every 11.25 games Stan = 6 in 42 = one goal every 7 games ie, Based on last season it would take odejayi 85 games longer than it would take istvan odejayi season before (at a lower level) = 15 in 51 = one goal ever 3.4 games stan (that season at barnsley) = 6 in 16 = one goal every 2.67 games ie Based on that season in england it would take odejayi 14.67 games longer to get 20. stan last season total (including abroad) = 11 goals in 33 games = one ever 3 games is Based on the season as a whole, it would take odejayi 8 games longer to score 20 goals. odejayi, total time at barnsley = 4 goals in 47 games = one ever 11.75 games stan , total time at barnsley = 12 goals in 58 games = one ever 4.83 games ie based on total time at barnsley it would take odejayi 138.33 games longer to score 20 goals. Yes, that is one HUNDRED and thirty-eight games longer. odejayi total career stats = 52 goals in 276 games = one goal every 5.30 games stan total career stats = 17 goals in 75 games = one goal every 4.41 games ie based on total career games it would take odejayi 17.91 games longer to score 20 goals. Every single set of goals per game stats has ferenczi as the one more likely to score a goal. The 06/07 season (both of thems best), last season, time at barnsley and total career games. In not one category does odejayi out perform.
RE: VERY selective again JC. Keep going, you're making a tit of yourself BOOM,Boom. Having to resort to personal insults now are we.</p> Time on pitch Hassell 1162.</p> Time on pitch Togwell 1133.</p> By my maths thats about 1.5% playing time difference. </p> Who's making a tit out of themselves now?</p> Keep digging mate. </p>
you said that hassell played less than togwell now you admit that it was not the case. by the way, I fear that your maths and statistics are out, hassell must have had the best season of his life last year if he only made 4 failed challenges all season, i counted 5 today and I probably didn't pay attention to a couple more as well.