RE: was watching one last night on Reality TV..... That's the sound that by pretty much all eyewitness accounts came from the basement of the WTC, around 80 floors below where the planes hit.
Could it have been aviation fuel that ran down the lift shafts into the basement that caused the second explosion and also wrecked the basement.
Wrong Both the express lifts and the lift from the sky lobby both went to the basement along with numerous HVAC and service ducts.</p> The following diagram illustrates the elevator layout for the towers. </p> I really dont know why I am even bothering to respond.</p> Its all bunkum. No serious engineering or civil body has cast any doubt upon the findings of the NIST.</p>
no secondary eplosions... these could be explained by the floors or internal beams fracturing. The thing that still gets me is - what on earth was on the underside of the second 767?Have a look at the video - In Plane Sight. The only conspiracy there may have been, imho, was to cover up for **** ups made by the US authorities in dealing with the situation.
I'm not saying there were any explosions that weren't caused by the planes hitting the buildings. It seems feasible to me that aviation fuel could have travelled to a different part of the structure or that the buildings own fuel stores or even gas supply could have caused secondary explosions. But if there were it's infinitely more logical to assume they were set by the terrorists. This government plot stuff is just bonkers.
RE: I'm not saying there were any explosions that weren't caused by the planes hitting the buildin I'm sure i saw a 3rd plane on the grassy knoll!!!
I would guess that if it was a conspiracy on the part of the US Government/CIA only a few people knew about it. Possibly Bush or the Defence Secretary, the odd agent and the CIA bigwigs. And if it was a conspiracy it would have been the knowledge that the attack was going to place and doing nothing about it or suppressing certain areas of security. You couldn't have all that organisation of the terror acts without a lot of people being involved. Some would have blabbed by now, it's human nature (unless they were shipped off the Afghanistan/Iraq and were got rid of by being "killed in action". As for the terrorist's planting of bombs in the buildings it's hard to see how they could have put enough explosives into the building that would have been greater than the energy force of the planes laden with fuel. It is intriguing though the way in which the towers fell in their own footprint. You would have thought that the plane strike would have caused them to topple a little. And as for the Pentagon, what happened to the wings? I wasn't expecting to see a cartoon sillohette of the plane in the building but I would have thought the wings would have made a few dents in the building.
the feds knew it was coming - they stopped all major people flying and why on they day did they relocate pretty much every defence resource away from New York City??? That one dont add up either.
RE: Obviously history tells us that things can be hushed up... JFK, RFK, Jimmy Hoffa, Princess Diana, The moon "landings" to name a few... it can't be all as we were intended to believe.
RE: seriously? Absolutely. It's all about making a big impact with these people and remember the planes were full of infidels as well.