Either repay it or give a layman's term explanation of why he/they were allowed to take that money from the club. People can then make up their own mind going forward then.
But you are the trust and I was addressing you as such. If I was interested in going on walks with you or getting a contract with brewdog I'd make that distinction. Look, I'm just telling it how I see it. The club is in a real mess, the only way the fans can get into the club is through you guys and we really need the trust to step up and properly hold the entire upper hierarchy to account and if you can't do that then it's your responsibility to arrange some kind of action designed to get the attention of the board. We don't need balance from the trust, we need decisive forward movement. It may sound harsh, but this is where I'm at now, and many others, and we have nowhere to vent our frustrations. (Edited: removed duplicate words)
I don’t wish to open up the generational inequality debate again, but I was interested to read that the biggest threat to Macron was his proposal to increase the state pension age from 62 to 65, whereas we allowed the ConDems to bring forward the age increase (which put a very large number of women into relative poverty), without so much as a whimper.
Nancy fans are not happy with Chien Lee and want him gone....... https://www.tipsbladet.dk/nyhed/generelle/fans-raser-over-ejer-der-ogsaa-bestemmer-i-dk-klub It's no better for Conman....... https://www.getfootballnewsfrance.c...way-theres-no-risk-of-seeing-nancy-disappear/
But you weren't though. Which was my point. You were talking things I've posted personally, as me, and stating that as Trust opinion or comment (or bias). You weren't addressing me with a new question as the Trust, but falling back on things that haven't been posted or shared as the Trust. You're saying 'we' here. What forward movement do you expect to see and have you had this endorsed by more than 100 supporters? I don't disagree, but as always things are far more simplistic on the outside to what might be going on behind the scenes. And not everything can be shared openly straight away.
https://www.estrepublicain.fr/sport...-actionnaires-s-exprime-pour-la-premiere-fois That's the full Conman interview. Sadly it's behind a paywall.
Thatcher knocked the stomach for protest out of the country's people when she broke the trade union movement. We've sat back and taken everything thrown at us since. As a nation we've now a tendency to look at any protesters with disdain.
Perhaps this target may help Helen You’ll have to imagine a picture of a goal mouth cos I can’t add the picture!!!
I've no issue with that. They've bought the club it's their money. It was perhaps a bit underhand. However, that's how these guys roll. Look at the Glazers at Man Utd. My issue will be if they don't make up the short fall in revenue this summer. I won't beat them over sumat that hasn't happened yet. As yet it's all hypothetical.
Unless it was a payment agreed by all parties at the time of the sale . I’ve lost track , have the Crynes disputed this payment and is it part of the court case or are they just wanting their final instalment of the revised purchase which is being disputed by the other investors
Contact any of the Board privately (you have the ability to do this more than most), go through the website, attend the AGM, private message through social media, request a call. We've sat on calls with supporters before. During work hours just to let people feel heard and give them a platform. We obviously don't shout about this as it isn't really news.
Reading between the lines I don't think they'd be that bothered as long as the instalments kept coming. Nobodies telling me they didn't know where the 750k came from. #just as bad.
