Why are adopting such an aggressive stance? Surely, when someone provides the proof you demanded to see of a one year rolling contract, then the responsibility rests with you when offering a counter argument? I'm a bit baffled as to why it matters anyway.
if you have player, watch the interviews back from when they joined. Both were on 12 month rolling contracts.
http://bfcst.org.uk/news-from-the-press-conference/ "Don was asked about the contract and replied that it was “as is usual these days” a one year rolling contract."