Curbishley's appointment didnt take long.

I'd just like to point out your error

When you post a message, be it a reply or a new thread, it will immediately go to the top. Therefore any threads you refer to will always be below.

Yours,
Grown man who buys kids toys....3 times

 

Not quite true my nerdy friend

Depends on how you view the posts.

 

RE: Not quite true my nerdy friend

I agree. If you view them while doing a handstand maybe.

 

RE: Not quite true my nerdy friend

or in Australia

 

if mccarthy had been unemployed i think it may have been a very similar scenerio

 

no it would not. he's pissed on his chips.

 

RE: if curbs was interested, then it would have probably...

</p>

So you're saying that the last one wasn't spot on?</p>

AR was given 11 games to prove himself in a caretaker role. He did that and he was given the job.</p>

Then he got us to promotion.</p>

I'm not saying that everything that has happened so far this year is fine but you can't knock the board or anyone else for appointing Andy at that time. He did what he did and we are now in a higher league. I thank him very much for that!</p>

 

way to read something that isn't written...

did I say anything about the last one????

no, thought not.

My point being, if they just appointed someone for the sake of it, we could go down and take years to get back.

Appointing "the right one" as you somehow read differently, is making sure they do appoint the person who's influence and tactical xxxxx who will keep us in this league.

That a better worded explanation?

oh, and for the record, I beleive the board made the right decision in sacking AR, cos I am sure we wouldn't have won 2 and drawn 2 with him in charge in the last 4 games.