So you completely dismiss nads' own comments on davey as being a complete load of B*ll*cks then! you just can't wait to jump on davey's back at any opportunity.... seems to me that whilst many had wonderul "rose tinted specs" for Sir andy richtea, that there are also some who won't accept that davey just might have something in him.
If you look back at when Nads first signed for us he said he joined us because he wanted to work with Ritchie. Fancypraising the manager just when he's negotiating a contract! He's not stupid isn't Danny, did it with Ritchie, did it with Davey. Look at all the facts before you jump to conclusions.
ok.... Richie Never Played him enough.........FACT Hart never played him enough........FACT His goals (at the key times) got us up and also kept us up...........FACT Now after this.......... Coventry - Home town Club.........FACT Coventry supporter.......FACT Dad Played for Coventry...........FACT All Footballers look for better deals.........FACT So is it any wonder he might just want to **** off where he may just get appreciated a bit more, and also paid more??? Can't see why people are jumping on his back, many would do the same in his situation, its called football/agents and the year 200X where every fecker does it
Personally i will be sorry to see Nardiello go, especially when he had got out of his idle ways, looked fit and was scoring goals at the end of last season. It just underlines the lack of loyalty shown by todays players. If he'd had a couple of injury free seasons playing well regularly and scoring goals then i wouldn't complain at him leaving for a bigger club. Be interesting to see which Nardi Coventry get? The lazy, injury prone, ball greedy t**t or the April 07 quality player. More the likely the latter! Main thing now is we have to move on and start looking for a quality striker to take his place in the squad.
No wonder at all. By the way you missed out Davey Never Played him enough.........FACT </p> </p> Surprised you missed that! He played Richards until he got injured and brought inRajczi don't forget.</p> Of course it'll be me that's biased though, eh?</p>
i'll add one more..... the original stats at the beginning are wrong... its actually 120 games and 31 goals.... but the main fact missed out is 62 Starts 58 Sub appearances (most of which were 5-10 minutes) 31 Goals So discount the worthless sub appearances when games were already more or less deceided and you have a decent return.... Much better than hayes/richards and all the rest of em... But don't let facts like these get in the way, after all he is a striker, and is paid to put the ball in the net, but that don't matter does it.
So, you've just proved that Nardiello had a good strike rate when Ritchie was manager too, seeing as he would have played most of those games under AR. </p> </p>
aye in league 1 where odejayi has a better goals/game ratio and in this division Ferenczi has a better goals / game ratio so lets not too hung up abart it.
Nardiello - who cares? He didn't do enough for Barnsley full stop. You can dissect his record anyway you want but the reason he came off the bench so many times is because he was too lazy, lacked consistency and didn't score enough goals or contribute enough overall to the team. He wouldn't have been on the bench otherwise. Good riddance. Now get a replacement in who will contribute when there's more than just his contract on the line.
RE: For lack of consistency... In all fairness mate your wrong! 91 apps 14 goals Which makes him a 1 in 6.5 man to be accurate!
RE: i'll add one more..... The stats are right if you check the club website and add them up yourself! 7+7+7+9=30 as far as i can see! Not that 1 appearance and 1 goal makes that much difference!