davey given three games to save his job

Interesting that one Kestyke to go at least 18 games,at what point of the season does that make it? How long do we continue to say 18 games , then leave untill Christmas
then into the new year then Fook we've been relegated. Then, from the same bunch who did not want his head, it will be a case of "Come on you negetive B.a.s.t.a.r.d.s buy a
season ticket and support your club to go forward and upwards. This man, who is in charge of a potentially good team might well have all of his bleeding badgers but he has no
insight or ability to man manage. That is why he employed another fooking half wit in has his second in command to emmulate his actions. When Davey shouts ****, Kidd jumps
on the shovel. End of rant. Sorry folks but just getting a bit pissed off with a manager who appears unable or unwilling to be sufficiently flexible to bring about change. Change
which lots of the fan base can see,except him and the other man.

 

Bleeding badgers

******* Norwegians.

 

I second that Baskerville.

If Davey takes us down (and it is still an IF) will those who wanted to keep him and give him time apologise to those of us who wanted change?

 

RE: It's too early, without question

I'd **** him off now to be honest. The only reason I can see for keeping him on is that some poor fcuker would have to pick up the pieces of the shambles we're currently in.

 

Err...3 games gone, plenty of time to get it right i think.

 

4 if you include Crewe and we haven't looked like winning any of them.

 

That would takes us to the 22nd of November, Preston away.

If he's still here I'd reckon on about 18 points looking at the fixtures. A point a game on average.</p>

Ritchies season 2006/7 18 matches - 15 points we were 3rd from the bottom, 4th from bottom had 16 points</p>

Daveys first full season 2007/8 18 matches - 26 points 10th place, 3rd from bottom had 16 points</p>

If we haven't got 10 points after ten matches it will probably be a scrap to the last match, if we are lucky.</p>

 

Apologise?</p>

Who's to say appointing someone else would make any difference at all? They'd still have pretty limited funds and a small squad, **** crowds and moaning Barstewards to put up with</p>

 

RE: It's too early, without question

What shambles? </p>

It's been 3 league games. fecking hell. Talk about an over reaction</p>

Yes we've not looked at all convincing (from what I've heard) BUT plenty of people have said there are promising signs. Course I'm a tad worried about the lack of pace in defence, and the lack of a left back, but we have 2 great keepers, a quality centre back in Foster, 2 decent full backs in Kozzy/Bobby, in my opinion a very useful midfield (when all fit, and yes we've had a lot missing in midfield) and a decent front 2 when they start to form a partnership.</p>

I'm not so sure I see the shambles. Yet anyway. Certainly not after 4 games</p>