I tend to agree with that. I think Hemsworth is a pain in the arse, but I would imagine some feel the same about me, does that mean I should be banned? The site's administrators can do what they like, we don't have a divine right to post on here, they can ban who they like and let who they like post, it's up to them, but they've always seemed like reasonable people to me, so I'm sure they're open to what we all think. I understand why they got frustrated with him and I can see why they banned him, but I thought that would be for a couple of days or a week at the most, not indefinitely. It seems very harsh on the kid when a lot of the problems at the time were actually caused by the people who used to follow him around, not by Hemsworth himself. Banning Hemsworth was the easy option to sort all that out and it has worked I suppose, but it's not his fault some people won't leave him alone. That's not to say he hasn't brought some problems on himself, but certainly not everything. If it was up to me I'd let him back on. I would have done months ago. Although I'm glad I'm not in the position to make the decision, or any decision about how this forum is run come to that.
He's a complete and utter c-unt at times But so are 100% of contributors on here, without exception. Let him come back.
His ban should be lifted......if he can now spell and compose intelligible sentences. Any further gibberish and he should be sentenced to be exposed before his peers.
OK the consensus seems to be to give him another chance which is fair enough by us (should he want it). If he reverts to type then he can expect a permanent ban. If we see the usual suspects continuing with their little digs at him then expect similar treatment. SiteAdmin