Mmm. So. Ritchie is awkward & won't compromise? How did you work that out? Don't you get tired of being wrong?
RE: what intransigence? reading between the lines the relationship between the chairman and AR has nver been good. The only person that benefits from saying the managers refusing to spend money is Shep. Why say it? It's devisive and frankly I don't believe it. add to that the boards refusal to sit down and talk about a contract and you've a situation that'll end in tears.
Not at all. It's taking about 5 minutes for me to post at the moment. This site is slower than the uptake at a "Boff Hartog" event.
RE: 'Boff Hartog' Is that your Uncle, who is a Policeman? I'm thinking speedboats & stupid sidekick. Whatever I'm thinking - it's ****. I'd better get back to my Thesaurtionary.
RE: what intransigence? OK then AR's obstinance in sticking with this squad when it is obvious to all we need to strenghen. Also playing 4-2-4 not 4-4-2. If we are paying with two attacking widemen it's not 4-4-2 it's 4-2-4. We don't get enough bodies in midfield because the two wide men are getting ball after ball into the box which we are not converting into goals. Could this be the reason players are shooting unchallenge from the edge of the box and scoring against us? Only two teams have really made 4-2-4 work, Brasil in '62 and Celtic in '67. Both had the benefit of having a centre forward who did not miss 5 or 6 chances every match.
RE: 'Boff Hartog' Yes, him with the white suit. The same colour as your blue t shirt. </p> Drove past Pinewood Studios on Setdi after the match. Me & SM nearly knocked to see if anyone was playing.</p>
RE: Nice Thesaurus use dictionary boy. Who the hell sed owt abart talking sence? Thar on bbs for gods sake.
You know **** all. Jay knows more than you about football, and that's saying summat. I like the use of "Brasil" - like you're a native. Excellent. Yes. We play 4-2-4. Whatever you say. You need to create your very own football coaching website where you can converse with yourself ... as that's the only person interested in what you spout.
RE: 'Boff Hartog' One hundred pounds sterling gets SM some water sports. Hello Kids. Look out - Uncle Johnnycoachman is after your Opta Index.
RE: what intransigence? If Ritchie really has turned down money on offer to strengthen the squad, he'll probably be the first manager in history to do so. Ritchie isn't daft, he'll recognise we'll struggle with the small squad we have. All we can do is speculate as to what cash is available, what the relationship is like between GS and AR etc... What we can do though is make a judgement based on common sense. The club is recovering from crippling debts and GS is attempting to make it self sufficient. GS and the board appear reluctant to offer Ritchie a new contract. Putting two and two together, I suspect that there is no money available for transfers and Ritchie is simply toeing the line. Ritchie's reward for supporting board and not bleating about his contract situation is to get criticised on here. Not exactly fair is it.
RE: 'Boff Hartog' Some old bint who wasn't much cop. Still spattered her face in spoff though. I need to tell you his "22 minutes story". Not on here though. No way.
I remember The majority of last season you were on Ritchie's case. Then we were promoted and according to you you'd be behind him all the while. Now the results aren't too great and the old Coachman is here again. You're a shallow husk of a man.
That goes without saying. Do you use such language when you're chasing 11 year old boys around the pitch? You'll end up with an £80 fine. If I'm a lovely person ... do I have a "Brasilian"?
Hey don't worry If we do go down then we'll be able to win more games next season against less worthy opponents. FFS on a stick, of course I do not want us to go down, however, even more so I do not want Andy and the lads to abandon playing football, that way lies hell.