Fabio Jalo

Had he not been injured I'm sure he would have been at least on the bench infront of watters and Marsh. No need to rush him into the 1st team though.

 

Him and Cosgrove driving us to League 1 Champions next season.

 

Well that’s some recovery 4 days from being injured to international football.

 

Ah so you don't think he's been injured conspiracy theory... interesting.

 

Neill said he was back in training a couple of weeks ago, and that he'd have been involved in this week's U21s game, and next week's, but his call-up meant that he'd likely get the minutes needed into his legs for his country instead. And a good 70 minutes the other day bodes well.

Be great to have him back for selection. Was just starting to establish himself. His cameo at Reading in particular.

 

If people genuinely believe this they need to give their heads a wobble!

 

Eh conspiracy you don’t go from months out to straight on a plane to play for your national team! Where’s the conspiracy? Can you not remember the Cauley 2 weeks(4 months) scenario?

 

Please explain why we'd not be playing him, even in u21s. Genuinely confused as to why you think

 

I think if he wasn't injured he would be playing or at least on the bench infront of Marsh and watters lik3 he was before injury.

 

I should get a game before Watters.

 

So we are either allowing Portugal to play him whilst injured, or we are allowing him to play his first match since a fairly long injury, to be for a team where we can't analyse in person how his recovery from that injury has been.
Both options do seem a bit unusual.

 

How long have you been watching football? After a lengthy injury players have to get match fit, generally with the U21 or U23 so given that hasn’t happened something is amiss.

 

You mean such as by playing 60 odd minutes for an under 19s side? Something like that?

 

Usually not done for a team that doesn't pay the wages.

 

Yes, but I don't understand why we'd do that?? That's what I'm asking. I could get if it was because there's a transfer window opening in the next 48 hours but there isn't. I could understand if he had refused a contract, but he didn't. So I don't understand why you think this?

 

Not in the starting XI v Serbia U19 this evening which kicked-off at 8.

 

I know thats a joke but we do need to give the lad another chance.

 

Along them lines but more than 60 mins

 

Totally agree, it seems daft to invest so much money on him and then not have him in the squad.

 

Sunk cost fallacy!