FAO The pseudo liberals re. capital punishment.

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board ARCHIVE' started by Guest, Jan 5, 2006.

  1. Stu

    Stuppa New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,238
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Lorenzo
    Yep

    Good point, I missed that. I don't think anyone here is saying lets release dangerous paedophiles back on to the streets.
     
  2. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: Eh?

    "I think a sensible option, in which we might avoid the killing of innocents or those who might still contribute something,"

    Or maybe Stuppa meant "contribute something" in the big house eh?
     
  3. Tomi

    Tomi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    4,196
    Likes Received:
    1,125
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Finland
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    RE: Once again you've missed it by a country mile Tomi.

    Yes, what makes you think that I didn't think of that? I'm glad that the girl is still alive. But what's your point? If the men had killed her, surely that would have made their crime even worse, no matter how many times they would have raped her... Of course this is a shocking crime, but you seem to be more concerned about those men getting punished than about the girl.

    Haha, right, and you brought up some wrong facts too.
    I don't know why you have to refer to the Rob Knowles debate, because it has nothing to do with this, but I'll have to comment anyway. You and some others were constantly bashing Rob Knowles here on this BBS, dropping little hints and inside things only known to the secret Lucorum society (or wherever you guys gather up nowadays). I knew that there was something else going on 'behind the scenes', but then a public BBS shouldn't have been the place to discuss it. I admit that I made a mistake, but you can hardly blame me for that, after filling the board with all the anti-Rob Knowles nonsense for weeks.
    Also, I don't know what my so-called "know-all attitude" has to do with all this. Killing a human being is wrong in every case, in my opinion. If you don't agree, that's fine with me, but don't expect everyone to agree with you. And about this case, I know everything that I really need to know.
     
  4. EastStander

    EastStander Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    29,883
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Upper tier, Gangway 11
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The Lucorum Society

    I like it! :pff
     
  5. Tomi

    Tomi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    4,196
    Likes Received:
    1,125
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Finland
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    RE: Come on

    Um... I remember arguing with you only twice - first time during your anti-Rob Knowles campaign, and now in this thread. So, what is it that I do every time?
     
  6. Rosco

    Rosco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,453
    Likes Received:
    2,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Optimist
    Location:
    Born in Birdwell, living in Sin (well...Cheshire).
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    RE: Narthen

    I'd have let him off, but given him 25 years for being a claims assesor - scum of the earth they are, lock em up and eat the key.
     
  7. Gue

    Guest Guest

    What the **** are you on about now?

    I don't know where to start with that. There was one line that stood out, "you seem to be more concerned about those men getting punished than about the girl." Are you sure you want to say that to me?


    You've completely misunderstood almost everything I've said. I suggest you read back through what's been said already. And next time, before entering a debate with your dumb adolescent assertions, try to get at least a slight grasp of what the ****'s going on.
     
  8. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: Come on

    Did I say you argue with me every time?

    Fcking hell. Slow down and think for once.
     
  9. Gue

    Guest Guest

    Party Political Broadcast

    The WINDY FOR PRIME MINISTER PARTY Manifesto

    If our party wins the next General Election, we pledge to install Windy at Number 10 and institute the following policies to solve all major issues with immediate effect.

    1.LAW AND ORDER - Capital punishment will be reintroduced. For murder. And other stuff. Anything the boss finds abhorrent really.

    2.UNEMPLOYMENT - Following election, everyone in the nation will have 7 days to submit a letter to the PM outlining everything they have thought or done in their lives which may offend him. Failure to comply will result in sanctions (see point 1 above). Anyone without a job can then be employed in the postal service, or as one of the thousands of letter readers he will need to employ to see what we've all been up to. And then after that as a State Executioner..er..Law Enforcement Agent. If there's anyone still left without a job, join the armed forces – it'll not be long before an entire nation offends Windy's moral sensibilities and needs levelling.

    3.POPULATION CONTROL AND IMMIGRATION – No-one is allowed in. Simple and effective. As for reducing the current overpopulation problem, following from the letter writing programme, anyone who has done something the PM doesn't like will be subject to Law and Order measures (see point 1 above). Due to the large volume of people likely to be involved, criminals will be categorised by religious faiths. Muslims will go first, then other predominantly brown religions, then others in an order to be determined by the PM. Maybe Jews next, to follow in the footsteps of our hero's own political hero.

    4.ELECTORAL REFORM – Windy will always decide what's right. So when he decides he's getting it wrong he will be right to resign. And has the right to choose the right man as his successor. No more of these silly elections.

    5.ECONOMIC GROWTH – Sorted by measures 1-4 above. House prices will hit more reasonable levels as new supply of former people's houses outstrip demand placed by the diminished population. Everyone will be better off as there will be generous tax cuts. This is due to the huge amounts we will save on folly such as trials and imprisonment for offenders. And maintaining democracy, stuff like that. Just accept Windy was right all along, and always will be, and feel the weight of extra money in your pocket!

    So – can we count on your vote next time out?
     
  10. Stu

    Stuppa New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,238
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Lorenzo
    Bah

    'Contribute something' might not necessarily mean letting 'em out.

    And my whole point was that the system would root out those that are a risk and prevent them ever doing anything again. So dangerous paedophiles would not be released. Although I agree that putting such a fool-proof system in place would be difficult.
     
  11. Gue

    Guest Guest

    It's a bit like the old OP society

    But are real people!

    PS! Noticed the OP isn't as popular after TT left!!!!!! STRANGE!
     
  12. Gue

    Guest Guest

    YES!
     
  13. Tomi

    Tomi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    4,196
    Likes Received:
    1,125
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Finland
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    RE: What the **** are you on about now?

    Well, you've already said how you'd like to kick these men to death and it seems to be very important to you that they'll be dead soon enough.

    There's no need for personal insults, but oh well... Is that your default line when you've got nothing more to say? I'd like to know what those "dumb adolescent assertions" of mine are, because to me they sound like fair points. But yeah, apparently I've clearly misunderstood everything and you have won this debate. Congratulations, Windy. (H)
     
  14. Stu

    Stuppa New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,238
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    San Lorenzo
    knack

    Steady on old lad. You can be a bit overbearing sometimes. Just saying like.
     
  15. Gue

    Guest Guest

    Missed this one

    Of course. If you don't murder people, it's safe to assume you're going to commit more of other crimes. So, death penalty for crimes you've commited AND death penalty for crimes Windy thinks you're going to commit

    I like it.
     
  16. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: What the **** are you on about now?

    QED
     
  17. Tomi

    Tomi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    4,196
    Likes Received:
    1,125
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Finland
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    RE: Come on

    Well, I can't remember arguing with that many other people either...

    Look, these three men made a horrible crime and I too hope they get righteously punished. You want them dead, I want them to be locked up in a prison cell for the rest of their lives. No big difference, but it seems to be important for you. Y Goch mentioned a very good reason why capital punishment shouldn't be brought back.

    So what are you even arguing about?
    <font size="-3">I will not argue about the Rob Knowles thing in this thread. If you like, you can e-mail me or PM me or whatever.</font>
     
  18. Gue

    Guest Guest

    RE: knack

    I know I shouldn't rise mate. It's the culmination of years of minor irritation at Tomi's attitude. I ought to just ignore him.
     
  19. Tomi

    Tomi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    4,196
    Likes Received:
    1,125
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Finland
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    "Years of minor irritation"

    LOL!
    You mean, 2005 and 2006?
     
  20. Gue

    Guest Guest

    Heh heh.

    Go on then.

    I'm all worn out with getting mad at Tomi.
     

Share This Page