Flicker audioboo..

I'm starting to like him as he morphs deeper into my mate Keith.

Talks ****
Loses football games
Talks more ****

If he wears a Barbour Satdi I might ***** all o'r West Stand.

 

You people, on a website

you're opinions are discounted. Starting to sound like Alan Partridge never mind Keith Hill.

 

Pressure's on imho.

Not even a Barbour Heritage Dragh Waxed Jacket can save him.

 

Side's have sussed out how to play against pressing sides, we took folk by surprise last year. It's very simple to play against and leaves huge areas all over the midfield that an half decent team can absolutely kill you with. A team with a couple of decent midfielders will soon tear a pressing team a new arsehole, like Wigan did to us. 2 pressing midfielders against another midfielder leaves 1 of those pressing way out of position, a good midfielder will exploit that and leave them chasing shadows all afternoon.

I've been watching a bit of that Gary Neville on Sky Sports.

German footballs ****.

 

Re: You people, on a website

*Waves to Flicker*

 

I'll defend him to the hilt if he turns up wearing that with Ian Brown playing on tannoy and Sidney's arm bands in his pocket.

 

Good point, shall be getting F.E.A.R on't ipod as I drive up Saturday. We all have to do our bit.

 

I'm gonna talk to my fatha in riddles and buzz words all the way to Barnsley in the car. Fully on board me.

 

How, with a squad that's so big, haven't you got the flexibility to change the formation? If that's the case, he hasn't recruited well enough.

Look at Dale right now, we've got so many formations at our disposal because Hill has recruited players who can play multiple roles. Why wouldn't the same apply?

 

We have got numerous players who can perform different roles and play in different formations.

But Flicker doesn't want to change it, because he says we're playing like we were last season.

We're unable to play 3-5-2 because we've lost Stones and Golbourne. Only, we lost Stones in January, and Golbourne in the Summer. We've played Wiseman/JOB in the RWB role to some degree, and RNL bossed it there in the two starts I saw at Oakwell. So much so, that Flicker proclaimed him 'a man' who deserved '30, 40 starts now'.

Contrary Mary.

 

Pressure.

 

99.5% of the crowd are with him the other 5% not, strange calculation that but lets not forget just about the only time the ground turned on Hill turned out to be his last game. I wonder if Paul Walker has stopped laughing at all he heard there.

 

Golbourne, the best wing-back in the league? - REALLY? I'm not sure myself. RNL was better there really, from an offensive point of view anyway.

Re-call RNL and we could easily set up like this at the back.

............Ramage M'Voto Cranie
Wiseman.................................RNL

Get Paddy in behind the strikers and it could be an even stronger version of the 352 we had last season.

 

But where would TK play?

 

He'd find somewhere Whitey, tha knows that?

 

Never quite get it when supporters completely turn on the manager, to the extent where they openly demand he's sacked from his job, and then moan when he tries to exclude them and concentrate on the support him and the team receive, so negativity doesn't set in.