I'm sure there is & was thinking myself that we could retain Hassell's services & lose Kay's. We could also lose them both. However, if it was a choice of one or the other, which way do you think would serve our needs the best?
Aye... ...if something is seen on video but not seen by the ref or reported by him then the FA can take action. Vice-Versa if the referee has seen it and not deemed it sufficient for a card etc the FA cannot take retrospective action.
Tough call Depends on Reid - we have Austin to cover Hassell but will Reid be available to cover for Kay?
having seen the replay on sky i dont think it is clear enough for a successful appeal. Danns does lunge at Hassell but then the view is blocked by Danns so cant really see if Hassell does anything or not. "Get yer boots Ozzy, your playing".
from what I saw.. sitting in lower east, seems that Kay and their player had a bit of argy bargy (over the Brum player's refusal of a handshake so another person told me), Hassell ran over to join in and the other player (Danns?) got him by the throat at one point... saw Colgan pull Brum's keeper out of it all then it was down to the playing staff to join in... guess they'll judge it by the video evidence..</p>
they shouldnt mess with Kidd, once at Preston when he was on the bench apparently he ran onto the pitch, twatted an opponent three times and went back to the bench, the ref didnt see him so he got ogg with it