Maybe you could swap with Rob. </p> You do seem capable of composing a coherent sentence and maybe Rob could spot a talent if it sat on his face.</p>
RE: Maybe you could swap with Rob. I do a similar job to Mr Knowles, but I do it well. If you enjoy Newton Faulkner that's your problem, not mine. I won't be playing his records and my listeners will thank me for it.
Stone Roses - "Talentless Manc tossers" - Eaststander. </p> Back in your corner.</p> We established that we're talking abouttalentand not musical tastes further up the thread. </p>
But that doesn't preclude someone from commenting on music It's about personal opinion, everyone likes something different. Why does everyone have to fall in line with your opinion of it.
You're still missing the point. </p> You called them "talentless" which, whether you enjoy listening to them or not, is just wrong. Can't you see the difference? </p>
That's very magnanimous of you..... </p> ....but perhaps you should save the humouring until you've managed to differentiate between personal taste and an appreciation of talent.</p>
RE: And the definition of talent.... Not really but I would think that it would have to include a measure of artistic achievement.
I have no issues differentiating between personal taste and talent The type of genre that Newton Faulkner plays I do listen to at times. However I believe he is a poor example of it. His voice isnt that good, his musical ability limited and his songs samey
RE: Agreed. In which case, if you're now asking "how talented is this guy?" I would have to say "not very". But then again that's only my opinion.