Looking on as a neutral ...it would appear to be exactly the same kind of statement produced by the illustrious board at S6 (titanic) to explain the departures of Bougherra, Brunt, Whelan, Maclean etc. ie "Don't blame us, we've done all we can". Not a happy state of affairs and I sympathise with you.
RE: Looking on as a neutral Hehe.</p> No pillock but wtf is happening with Geoff Sheard and his takeover ? Yorkshire Post seem to be on a downer about it ? </p>
RE: Looking on as a neutral Like that's ever gonna happen - he's a chancer. God knows what he was expecting to gain from the situation. In the mean time we keep going in ever-dwindling numbers but at least anyone who does want to take over now know that they can get a controlling interest reasonably easy and the relationship between the board and Wednesdayite seems to have made a startling recovery.
RE: Is there only me that thinks- fair enough? I think it's pretty obvious that the club were hoping to keep him for most of this season, as it goes without saying that a fit and interested Brian Howard is of huge benefit to the club and its performances. When it has become clear that we don't now have a fit and interested Brian Howard, the club have decided he might as well go while we can get something for him. Not rocket science really.
Wait for Brian Howards, response to BFC I think you will find it tottally contradicts BFC. Howard has NEVER wanted to leave the club
RE: They should play for who's paying them though. Why what the **** would you have done????? He's every right to be out in his local town centre
Careful! He's dead hard like, is Windy. He's nota brain-dead muppet who thinks he's still in the playground, you know.