I think the negative respone on here is because................

I thnk it's because we're right at the bottom of the table and we lose more or less every game.

 

I seem to go one way then the other. Liked Gudjon, didn't like PHart, liked Ritchie, didn't like Davey, liked Robins and hated Hill. There were a lot of things I admired about Robins and we could have gone far if things had been different.

 

So you should like Flicker then to continue the pattern!

I suppose my principle is that they all are largely operating under the same constraints, some perhaps more than others, and consequently I will try and take the context in to account.

 

'and we could have gone far if things had been different'

We talking about Keith?

 

There is one constant with all these managers; Robins, Keith, Flicker.

They've all managed more or less when the clubs ownership was at its most "remote". Flicker seems to be in like position to take advantage of a potential return to Davey style support for signings. Lets hope he makes a better fist of it...

 

Agreed.

 

Most certainly not.

 

I do like him but if I don't agree with certain things then I will make my feelings known on here. Which is the only reason for this board's existence.