The irony! "It's perfectly reasonable to deduce what someone believes from what they say" http://www.barnsleyfc.org.uk/bbs/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=142274&mid=951409#M951409
You're really going to have look that word up. </p> Idon't think I've seen you use it properly yet.</p> What did you deduce? That your description of an anti-BNP rally was a bit gay?</p>
I'd better spell it out for you I respond to a thread that says "We live in a Democracy so people can vote for whomever they like." with "Who has stopped anyone trying to vote BNP" i.e the inference in the original post that the anti-BNP rally were trying to stop people voting for who they wanted. You said "Can't see where he says that" as though how could I possibly make that assumption. Then just 2 days later you post "It's perfectly reasonable to deduce what someone believes from what they say and, in this case, it's an obvious deduction. By your logic people only believe what they can be exactly quoted as saying which, you know full well, is ridiculous." Priceless!
Me too And if it's more they're obviously managing their finances much better than us as they seem to have a similar fan base. If it's less then it just shows we're not getting value for money from our players. Whichever way you look at it they're doing a much better job with a similar number of paying customers.
an obvious deduction? Did nutkins say "I deduce from what PC says that the owner of the club believes....." or did he post "the owner of the club believes" which is something entirely different. an error of logic or an obtuse leap of logic? what the fcucking hell are you on about? I deduce you are either confused or trying to confuse. I am not interested in going on a windy circuitous thread route, the above top sentence says all that needs to be said.
Indeed you did... but still managed to praise Cryne for his decision to back Davey. OK, technically straddling two fences I suppose.
RE: Very disappointing comments from PC to still be blaming Ritchie 2yrs on is poor form from PC. Back Davey by all means if PC thinks he's the right man but to give lame excuses for his short comings and play the 'little club' card ....very very poor indeed
They recently got 3.25m for Kyle Lafferty for a start think they have sold a number of players in the last few years for decent money, have been stable in the championship for longer than us and have not been in admin.
If the wage bill is less then the value for money of the players should be questioned. If more how has it been funded ? through transfer income at Spartacus has suggested, increased debt or a combination.
its not a case of aiming for 21st because we all know PC wanted better however finishing above relegation is a minimum expectation albeit a disappoiniting one
RE: If the wage bill is less It doesn't have to be debt. Maybe they make more from advertising, from cooperate, from merchandising. Maybe their other overheads are lower. They don't seem to be in financial trouble, so I'm guessing it isn't debt.
RE: Truly you can I think we should go after Paul Ince. I think not doing so is a mistake. However, if PC thinks the right move is keeping Simon Davey, I don't think backing him in public is a mistake, which was the point I made in my initial post.
RE: Very disappointing comments from PC surely p.c should be putting a positive spin on our season /club/facilities/manager( whatever he really thinks) to try and bull up our image at every opportunity to the media/prospective players.maybe p.c could take a leaf out of donny ryans book and be aiming for world domination in 3 years.
A very helpful explanation. Given the stupidity of the deduction you were trying to make there. For "Can't see where he says that" read can't see where he infers that or gives the slightest inkling that he may be thinking that. </p>
Yeah, you said you couldn't be arsed at lunchtime. </p> But almost eight hours later you're still wriggling.</p>