Jade Goody Has Months To Live

What do you think I'm talking about Low-Life?

Cheap T-shirts obviously. What else would I be talking about? (blaze) </p>

 

Come on. Out with it.

</p>

You think you might know something but you're not sure and you know that saying it could get you into trouble so you ponce around on here making lame insinuations. You think you're scoring points butall you're actually doing is providing me with an opportunity to call your bluff and prove that not only are you wrong but you're also a coward.</p>

 

Calm down Low-Life.

So says the coward whoposts a picture and then quickly deletes it before it gets him into trouble. So you can do away with the name calling eh, Low-Life? Coward.</p>

 

LDRed, If you had not said 'she deserves everything shes got'

and 'good riddance' then I dont think you would have got as much grief on here.

I agree that what she is doing is undignified and a clear continuation of her desire to be 'famous' and make money out of the media rather than having any philanthropic basis or to 'raise awareness' of an illness.

That said, she dont deserve to die (but I notice you have since retracted that bit though).

 

LDRed, If you had not said 'she deserves everything shes got'

and 'good riddance' then I dont think you would have got as much grief on here.

I agree that what she is doing is undignified and a clear continuation of her desire to be 'famous' and make money out of the media rather than having any philanthropic basis or to 'raise awareness' of an illness.

That said, she dont deserve to die (but I notice you have since retracted that bit though).

 

And away we go with the gibberish.

</p>

QED.</p>

 

True... if you overlook the obvious

The glaring difference is that one was aimed at a specific individual and the other was aimed at a loose stereotype. Ronnie Barker said he liked making fun of idiots because nobody thinks they're an idiot and so nobody is offended. If somebody is sat at their computer now thinking oi, I'm a work-dodging, system playing, McDonald's eating, loose moralled chav well then they're fair game. But I doubt they are. See, no bigotry involved.

I see there are loads of people jumping on the band wagon in response to LD's unfortunate comments. This on a board that regularly sees a cheap "it's funny because it's inappropriate" laugh at whoever's passed away that week, Maddie McCann, you name it. Yet they slip past un-noticed unless somebody sets the ball rolling. Maybe we should all back up a bit. No wait... what's that Jeremy Clarkson saying now... give me the number of the Daily Mail and the BBC!

 

Jade does fit that "Chav" Stereotype though

I can't see why some people would advocate a "final solution" for Chav's in one thread and then claim that LD's comments in this thread are inappropriate.

 

Gibberish and answering your own posts, Low-Life?

You really are losing it, aren't you? Too much (blaze) ?

 

RE: Jade does fit that "Chav" Stereotype though

I'm afraid that's about the standard of debate nowadays. The Ming-mongs have taken over the board cosanyone left of Atilla the Hun is driven off by abuse. </p>

 

Amusing.

 

is this going to be a long thread thiny???? nt