If it indeed was ‘pre agreed’, why would the club state on the retained list he had terms offered? To me this suggests new terms, differing to the original contract. In my opinion of course. Why wasn’t the extension announced like the Mads or Collins deals if it had taken place?
It's because we have Jalo, Dyer & Marsh 'coming through' Then obviously Cole, Shaw, Dallas, Watters and Iseka. But personally I would rather us get rid of Iseka &/or Cole.. I prefer Norwood at this level.
They didn't did they? They said these players have been retained or offered new terms. His name was one of many that included retained players.
Worst news possible on eve of season, he’s our main goal threat. Seen the pictures of him in an Oldham shirt. If there’s not a replacement lined up season is well and truly in jeopardy.
Not like us to sell a goal threat on the eve of a new season is it....Worked out well last time didn't it....
And I’ll put money on this centre half not being available due to fitness issues till the end of august
So bizarre. I can't get my head around it. Why they letting him go after he's been the main goal threat in pre season. Why does he want to drop to national league. So baffling. I was saying to a mate the other day that we had 5 strikers that were all a bit too similar, I said it would be nice to see a target man type come in but I certainly wouldn't have chosen to move Nors on to accommodate that. Hope they have something planned.
I was told I was over reacting to his presser. Then it's revealed that Khaled wanting him out over none footballing reasons.